1984Journal of Medical EntomologyRequires access

Distributional Associations Among Geomydoecus and Thomomydoecus Lice (Mallophaga: Trichodectidae) and Pocket Gopher Hosts of the Thomomys Bottae Group (Rodentia: Geomyidae)1

Ronald A. Hellenthal, Roger Price

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

A computerized taxonomic and geographic storage, retrieval, analysis, and distribution mapping system was used to evaluate 51,670 specimens of Geomydoecus and Thomomydoecus chewing lice collected from 226 species and subspecies of the pocket gophers Thomomys bottae, T. umbrinus, T. townsendii, and T. bulbivorus. These lice consisted of 52 species and subspecies in 8 complexes. Comparison of the geographic ranges of louse complexes with those of associated host taxa showed that, while most host taxa had a fairly uniform louse fauna, 70 subspecies possessed geographically separated localities with 2 or more louse taxa from the same genus. The distribution of louse complexes corresponded reasonably well to pocket gopher species but showed a somewhat different separation between T. bottae and T. umbrinus than that presently defined by gopher taxonomists. Comparison of geographically isolated host populations based on louse associations showed both similarities to and differences from that based on allozymal similarity among the hosts, with the louse-based groups geographically well defined. Individual hosts rarely harbored more than 1 louse species per genus, and in 1 case where this occurred the host was found to be an F1 hybrid of parental taxa that were each associated with 1 of the louse species.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A computerized taxonomic and geographic storage, retrieval, analysis, and distribution mapping system was used to evaluate 51,670 specimens of Geomydoecus and Thomomydoecus chewing lice collected from 226 species and subspecies of the pocket gophers Thomomys bottae, T. umbrinus, T. townsendii, and T. bulbivorus. These lice consisted of 52 species and subspecies in 8 complexes. Comparison of the geographic ranges of louse complexes with those of associated host taxa showed that, while most host taxa had a fairly uniform louse fauna, 70 subspecies possessed geographically separated localities with 2 or more louse taxa from the same genus. The distribution of louse complexes corresponded reasonably well to pocket gopher species but showed a somewhat different separation between T. bottae and T. umbrinus than that presently defined by gopher taxonomists. Comparison of geographically isolated host populations based on louse associations showed both similarities to and differences from that based on allozymal similarity among the hosts, with the louse-based groups geographically well defined. Individual hosts rarely harbored more than 1 louse species per genus, and in 1 case where this occurred the host was found to be an F1 hybrid of parental taxa that were each associated with 1 of the louse species.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A computerized taxonomic and geographic storage, retrieval, analysis, and distribution mapping system was used to evaluate 51,670 specimens of Geomydoecus and Thomomydoecus chewing lice collected from 226 species and subspecies of the pocket gophers Thomomys bottae, T. umbrinus, T. townsendii, and T. bulbivorus. These lice consisted of 52 species and subspecies in 8 complexes. Comparison of the geographic ranges of louse complexes with those of associated host taxa showed that, while most host taxa had a fairly uniform louse fauna, 70 subspecies possessed geographically separated localities with 2 or more louse taxa from the same genus. The distribution of louse complexes corresponded reasonably well to pocket gopher species but showed a somewhat different separation between T. bottae and T. umbrinus than that presently defined by gopher taxonomists. Comparison of geographically isolated host populations based on louse associations showed both similarities to and differences from that based on allozymal similarity among the hosts, with the louse-based groups geographically well defined. Individual hosts rarely harbored more than 1 louse species per genus, and in 1 case where this occurred the host was found to be an F1 hybrid of parental taxa that were each associated with 1 of the louse species.

Key concepts: Louse, Mallophaga, Biology, Subspecies, Zoology, Host (biology), Taxon, Fauna

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Distributional Associations Among Geomydoecus and Thomomydoecus Lice (Mallophaga: Trichodectidae) and Pocket Gopher Hosts of the Thomomys Bottae Group (Rodentia: Geomyidae)1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens