2012•LaCRIS (University of Lapland)Open access

A unique arrangement of soft-law cooperation in the Barents Region

Waliul Hasanat

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The governance in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region (BEAR) formally began in 1993; it was based on a soft-law model. Soft-law governance includes international governance established without the conclusion of a formal international treaty. The actors involved in soft-law governance pay more attention to encountering transnational challenges in effective ways than focusing on strictly following formalities articulated in classical international law. There are some transnational challenges (e.g., environmental protection, climate change, sustainable development, the wellbeing of the region, and the adaptation of local people to changed situations) which state involvement alone is not sufficient to counter; they require the participation of non-state actors, including local people, along with that of states. Addressing those challenges sometimes requires immediate action, and the conclusion of a formal international treaty – which is a lengthy process compared with the adoption of a simple declaration – might interfere with achieving the main objectives. Soft-law forms of governance allow non-state actors, working in parallel with states, to address common concerns and create mainly voluntary or political commitments rather than imposing legally binding obligations on members and other associated entities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The governance in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region (BEAR) formally began in 1993; it was based on a soft-law model. Soft-law governance includes international governance established without the conclusion of a formal international treaty. The actors involved in soft-law governance pay more attention to encountering transnational challenges in effective ways than focusing on strictly following formalities articulated in classical international law. There are some transnational challenges (e.g., environmental protection, climate change, sustainable development, the wellbeing of the region, and the adaptation of local people to changed situations) which state involvement alone is not sufficient to counter; they require the participation of non-state actors, including local people, along with that of states. Addressing those challenges sometimes requires immediate action, and the conclusion of a formal international treaty – which is a lengthy process compared with the adoption of a simple declaration – might interfere with achieving the main objectives. Soft-law forms of governance allow non-state actors, working in parallel with states, to address common concerns and create mainly voluntary or political commitments rather than imposing legally binding obligations on members and other associated entities.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The governance in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region (BEAR) formally began in 1993; it was based on a soft-law model. Soft-law governance includes international governance established without the conclusion of a formal international treaty. The actors involved in soft-law governance pay more attention to encountering transnational challenges in effective ways than focusing on strictly following formalities articulated in classical international law. There are some transnational challenges (e.g., environmental protection, climate change, sustainable development, the wellbeing of the region, and the adaptation of local people to changed situations) which state involvement alone is not sufficient to counter; they require the participation of non-state actors, including local people, along with that of states. Addressing those challenges sometimes requires immediate action, and the conclusion of a formal international treaty – which is a lengthy process compared with the adoption of a simple declaration – might interfere with achieving the main objectives. Soft-law forms of governance allow non-state actors, working in parallel with states, to address common concerns and create mainly voluntary or political commitments rather than imposing legally binding obligations on members and other associated entities.

Key concepts: Soft law, Hard law, Treaty, Corporate governance, International law, Declaration, Political science, Global governance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A unique arrangement of soft-law cooperation in the Barents Region — Research Paper | ScholarLens