2003•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Preface

Krishan Kumar

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This book could have been entitled alternatively ‘the enigma of English national identity’. For it attempts to answer such questions as: why does ‘English nationalism’ sound so strange to English ears? Why is it – more than in most other cases – so elusive, so difficult to pin down? When – if at all – did it emerge? What is the relation of English national identity to the national identities of those other peoples – the Welsh, Scots and Irish – who share with the English the two islands off the northwestern coast of Europe? Can we separate English from British national identity and, if so, how? That these questions need to be asked suggests the peculiarity of the English case. It is not so much that English national identity cannot be distinguished by its ‘content’ – its self-conceived differences, flattering to the national pride, from other nations. This by itself is not unusual. What we call content is in most cases the product of the process by which nations are formed, rather than some qualities intrinsic or special to the nation in question. It is common enough for nations, as for individuals, to develop a sense of themselves by a process of opposition and exclusion. What they are – French, German – is defined by what they are not – German, French. The ‘content’ of national identity is more often than not a counter-image of what is seen as distinctive in the culture of the other nation or nations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This book could have been entitled alternatively ‘the enigma of English national identity’. For it attempts to answer such questions as: why does ‘English nationalism’ sound so strange to English ears? Why is it – more than in most other cases – so elusive, so difficult to pin down? When – if at all – did it emerge? What is the relation of English national identity to the national identities of those other peoples – the Welsh, Scots and Irish – who share with the English the two islands off the northwestern coast of Europe? Can we separate English from British national identity and, if so, how? That these questions need to be asked suggests the peculiarity of the English case. It is not so much that English national identity cannot be distinguished by its ‘content’ – its self-conceived differences, flattering to the national pride, from other nations. This by itself is not unusual. What we call content is in most cases the product of the process by which nations are formed, rather than some qualities intrinsic or special to the nation in question. It is common enough for nations, as for individuals, to develop a sense of themselves by a process of opposition and exclusion. What they are – French, German – is defined by what they are not – German, French. The ‘content’ of national identity is more often than not a counter-image of what is seen as distinctive in the culture of the other nation or nations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This book could have been entitled alternatively ‘the enigma of English national identity’. For it attempts to answer such questions as: why does ‘English nationalism’ sound so strange to English ears? Why is it – more than in most other cases – so elusive, so difficult to pin down? When – if at all – did it emerge? What is the relation of English national identity to the national identities of those other peoples – the Welsh, Scots and Irish – who share with the English the two islands off the northwestern coast of Europe? Can we separate English from British national identity and, if so, how? That these questions need to be asked suggests the peculiarity of the English case. It is not so much that English national identity cannot be distinguished by its ‘content’ – its self-conceived differences, flattering to the national pride, from other nations. This by itself is not unusual. What we call content is in most cases the product of the process by which nations are formed, rather than some qualities intrinsic or special to the nation in question. It is common enough for nations, as for individuals, to develop a sense of themselves by a process of opposition and exclusion. What they are – French, German – is defined by what they are not – German, French. The ‘content’ of national identity is more often than not a counter-image of what is seen as distinctive in the culture of the other nation or nations.

Key concepts: Scots, Welsh, National identity, National Identities, Identity (music), Nationalism, Relation (database), Irish

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Preface — Research Paper | ScholarLens