1996•Annals of the Entomological Society of AmericaRequires access

Survival and Development of Immature Stages of Four Hawaiian Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Reared at Five Constant Temperatures

Roger I. Vargas, William A. Walsh, Eric B. Jang, John W. Armstrong, Dale Kanehisa

Open publisher page 102 citations

Abstract

Development and survival of melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), oriental fruit fly, B. dorsalis (Hendel), B. latifrons (Hendel), and Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) eggs, larvae, and pupae were compared at 5 constant temperatures ranging from 16 to°C. Durations of the immature stages of B. cucurbitae, C. capitata, B. dorsalis, and B. latifrons ranged from 12.9 to 40, 14.7 to 46.2, 15.4 to 47.1, and 18.2 to 61.6 d, respectively, at 32–16°C. Species differed most conspicuously in duration of the egg stage and least conspicuously in duration of the pupal stage. Survivorship data indicated that B. latifrons was adapted to a narrower range of temperatures than the other 3 fruit fly species. Developmental thresholds were lower for the larval stage than for the egg and pupal stages for all species. Threshold values for all stages of C. capitata were lower than those for all Bactrocera species. Thermal requirements (degree-days) for development in the pupal stage were greater than those of the egg and larval stages in all species, and the requirements of B. latifrons were greater than those of the other species within each stage. These findings are discussed with respect to commodities treatment research, rearing, control methods using mass-reared insects, and fruit fly temporal and geographical patterns.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Development and survival of melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), oriental fruit fly, B. dorsalis (Hendel), B. latifrons (Hendel), and Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) eggs, larvae, and pupae were compared at 5 constant temperatures ranging from 16 to°C. Durations of the immature stages of B. cucurbitae, C. capitata, B. dorsalis, and B. latifrons ranged from 12.9 to 40, 14.7 to 46.2, 15.4 to 47.1, and 18.2 to 61.6 d, respectively, at 32–16°C. Species differed most conspicuously in duration of the egg stage and least conspicuously in duration of the pupal stage. Survivorship data indicated that B. latifrons was adapted to a narrower range of temperatures than the other 3 fruit fly species. Developmental thresholds were lower for the larval stage than for the egg and pupal stages for all species. Threshold values for all stages of C. capitata were lower than those for all Bactrocera species. Thermal requirements (degree-days) for development in the pupal stage were greater than those of the egg and larval stages in all species, and the requirements of B. latifrons were greater than those of the other species within each stage. These findings are discussed with respect to commodities treatment research, rearing, control methods using mass-reared insects, and fruit fly temporal and geographical patterns.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 102 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Development and survival of melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett), oriental fruit fly, B. dorsalis (Hendel), B. latifrons (Hendel), and Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) eggs, larvae, and pupae were compared at 5 constant temperatures ranging from 16 to°C. Durations of the immature stages of B. cucurbitae, C. capitata, B. dorsalis, and B. latifrons ranged from 12.9 to 40, 14.7 to 46.2, 15.4 to 47.1, and 18.2 to 61.6 d, respectively, at 32–16°C. Species differed most conspicuously in duration of the egg stage and least conspicuously in duration of the pupal stage. Survivorship data indicated that B. latifrons was adapted to a narrower range of temperatures than the other 3 fruit fly species. Developmental thresholds were lower for the larval stage than for the egg and pupal stages for all species. Threshold values for all stages of C. capitata were lower than those for all Bactrocera species. Thermal requirements (degree-days) for development in the pupal stage were greater than those of the egg and larval stages in all species, and the requirements of B. latifrons were greater than those of the other species within each stage. These findings are discussed with respect to commodities treatment research, rearing, control methods using mass-reared insects, and fruit fly temporal and geographical patterns.

Key concepts: Tephritidae, Biology, Annals, Library science, Classics, Horticulture, History, PEST analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Survival and Development of Immature Stages of Four Hawaiian Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Reared at Five Constant Temperatures — Research Paper | ScholarLens