1936•CYTOLOGIAOpen access

The Origin and Behaviour of Chiasmata XIII

A. A. Moffett

Open full text 34 citations

Abstract

(1). The chromosome number in Culex pipiens is 2n=6. Tetraploid cells have been observed in both mitotic and meiotic divisions.(2). In somatic divisions the homologous chromosomes show strong association throughout all stages of division, being in pairs in the diploid and in fours in the tetraploid. Somatic pairing in relation to the anomalous type of meiosis in the male Drosophila is discussed.(3). At meiosis in tetraploid cells, quadrivalents, bivalents and univalents occur, the number of multivalents being low. The failure of complete pairing may be due to three causes:(a) Low number of pairing blocks per chromosome.(b) Failure of chiasma formation in parts of chromosomes which have paired over a short distance.(c) Mechanical interference preventing chromosomes pairing at zygotene.(4). The chiasma frequency at Metaphase I differs in different individuals from 1.06 to 1.64 per bivalent. These differences are considered to be due to the action of different genotypes an chromosome pairing at meiosis.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

(1). The chromosome number in Culex pipiens is 2n=6. Tetraploid cells have been observed in both mitotic and meiotic divisions.(2). In somatic divisions the homologous chromosomes show strong association throughout all stages of division, being in pairs in the diploid and in fours in the tetraploid. Somatic pairing in relation to the anomalous type of meiosis in the male Drosophila is discussed.(3). At meiosis in tetraploid cells, quadrivalents, bivalents and univalents occur, the number of multivalents being low. The failure of complete pairing may be due to three causes:(a) Low number of pairing blocks per chromosome.(b) Failure of chiasma formation in parts of chromosomes which have paired over a short distance.(c) Mechanical interference preventing chromosomes pairing at zygotene.(4). The chiasma frequency at Metaphase I differs in different individuals from 1.06 to 1.64 per bivalent. These differences are considered to be due to the action of different genotypes an chromosome pairing at meiosis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

(1). The chromosome number in Culex pipiens is 2n=6. Tetraploid cells have been observed in both mitotic and meiotic divisions.(2). In somatic divisions the homologous chromosomes show strong association throughout all stages of division, being in pairs in the diploid and in fours in the tetraploid. Somatic pairing in relation to the anomalous type of meiosis in the male Drosophila is discussed.(3). At meiosis in tetraploid cells, quadrivalents, bivalents and univalents occur, the number of multivalents being low. The failure of complete pairing may be due to three causes:(a) Low number of pairing blocks per chromosome.(b) Failure of chiasma formation in parts of chromosomes which have paired over a short distance.(c) Mechanical interference preventing chromosomes pairing at zygotene.(4). The chiasma frequency at Metaphase I differs in different individuals from 1.06 to 1.64 per bivalent. These differences are considered to be due to the action of different genotypes an chromosome pairing at meiosis.

Key concepts: Chiasma, Meiosis, Biology, Bivalent (engine), Homologous chromosome, Pairing, Genetics, Somatic cell

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Origin and Behaviour of Chiasmata XIII — Research Paper | ScholarLens