TITANOTHERE ALLOMETRY, HETEROCHRONY, AND BIOMECHANICS: REVISING AN EVOLUTIONARY CLASSIC
Michael L. McKinney, Robert M. Schoch
Abstract
Michael L. McKinney, Robert M. Schoch
Abstract
A reanalysis of Osborn's titanothere data indicates that extrapolative growth of a constant allometric relationship alone ("hypermorphosis") does not account for the trend toward body and horn size increase. Empirically, we also observe possible positive changes in the y-intercept ("predisplacement" or early onset of development), and possibly, changes in the slope ("acceleration/neoteny" or changes in growth rate) between the Oligocene and Eocene groups. Theoretically, these may be responses to more massive body shapes, perforce accompanying size increase, which increase the amount of force to which the horns were subjected.
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A reanalysis of Osborn's titanothere data indicates that extrapolative growth of a constant allometric relationship alone ("hypermorphosis") does not account for the trend toward body and horn size increase. Empirically, we also observe possible positive changes in the y-intercept ("predisplacement" or early onset of development), and possibly, changes in the slope ("acceleration/neoteny" or changes in growth rate) between the Oligocene and Eocene groups. Theoretically, these may be responses to more massive body shapes, perforce accompanying size increase, which increase the amount of force to which the horns were subjected.
Key concepts: Heterochrony, Neoteny, Allometry, Biology, Evolutionary biology, Acceleration, Biological evolution, French horn