2000Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingRequires access

Application of the Case-Crossover Design to the Study of Occupational Acute Traumatic Hand Injury

Gary S. Sorock, David A. Lombardi, Russ Hauser, Ellen A. Eisen, Robert F. Herrick, Murray A. Mittleman

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

We conducted a case-crossover study of transient risk factors for occupational acute traumatic hand injury in 232 subjects recruited from occupational health clinics in New England. The a priori hazard period was 10 minutes before the injury. The control period for each subject was the total work-time exposed in the previous month. The relative risk for using malfunctioning or different from usual equipment or tools in the hazard period was 21.2 (95% confidence interval = 15.7–28.6). Relative risks were also significantly elevated for performing a task using an unusual work method, doing an unusual task, being distracted, or being rushed. Wearing gloves was protective (relative risk = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.3–0.9). We conclude that the case-crossover design is an appropriate method for studying transient risk factors for sudden-onset occupational injury.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We conducted a case-crossover study of transient risk factors for occupational acute traumatic hand injury in 232 subjects recruited from occupational health clinics in New England. The a priori hazard period was 10 minutes before the injury. The control period for each subject was the total work-time exposed in the previous month. The relative risk for using malfunctioning or different from usual equipment or tools in the hazard period was 21.2 (95% confidence interval = 15.7–28.6). Relative risks were also significantly elevated for performing a task using an unusual work method, doing an unusual task, being distracted, or being rushed. Wearing gloves was protective (relative risk = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.3–0.9). We conclude that the case-crossover design is an appropriate method for studying transient risk factors for sudden-onset occupational injury.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We conducted a case-crossover study of transient risk factors for occupational acute traumatic hand injury in 232 subjects recruited from occupational health clinics in New England. The a priori hazard period was 10 minutes before the injury. The control period for each subject was the total work-time exposed in the previous month. The relative risk for using malfunctioning or different from usual equipment or tools in the hazard period was 21.2 (95% confidence interval = 15.7–28.6). Relative risks were also significantly elevated for performing a task using an unusual work method, doing an unusual task, being distracted, or being rushed. Wearing gloves was protective (relative risk = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.3–0.9). We conclude that the case-crossover design is an appropriate method for studying transient risk factors for sudden-onset occupational injury.

Key concepts: Confidence interval, Crossover study, Medicine, Relative risk, Occupational safety and health, Hazard ratio, Poison control, Injury prevention

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Application of the Case-Crossover Design to the Study of Occupational Acute Traumatic Hand Injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens