1995LandslidesOpen access

A runoff function through drain boring

Akira Suemine, Michiyasu Shima, Toshifumi KONISHI

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The runoff analysis advocated by HINO and HASEGAWA was adopted the outflow through drain boring at Irahara landslide. The unit-hydrograph of surface runoff and interflow of No.1 carried out at 1989 changed after the drain boring executed at 1990. The unit-hydrograph of ground-water runoff did not change. The distance between No.1 and the drain boring at 1990 was about 100 m, therefore the sphere of drain boring influence was the same. The time constant of runoff became longer from about 9 hours at Aug. 1989 from about 30 or 40 hours at 1990, 1991 and 1992.It is clear that a small landslide is observed by extensometer and borehole-inclinometer. The unithydrograph of grount-water runoff does not change but the unit-hydrograph of surface runoff and interflow change. Therefore it seems to be the most probable that the ground-water gives rise to a small landslide.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The runoff analysis advocated by HINO and HASEGAWA was adopted the outflow through drain boring at Irahara landslide. The unit-hydrograph of surface runoff and interflow of No.1 carried out at 1989 changed after the drain boring executed at 1990. The unit-hydrograph of ground-water runoff did not change. The distance between No.1 and the drain boring at 1990 was about 100 m, therefore the sphere of drain boring influence was the same. The time constant of runoff became longer from about 9 hours at Aug. 1989 from about 30 or 40 hours at 1990, 1991 and 1992.It is clear that a small landslide is observed by extensometer and borehole-inclinometer. The unithydrograph of grount-water runoff does not change but the unit-hydrograph of surface runoff and interflow change. Therefore it seems to be the most probable that the ground-water gives rise to a small landslide.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The runoff analysis advocated by HINO and HASEGAWA was adopted the outflow through drain boring at Irahara landslide. The unit-hydrograph of surface runoff and interflow of No.1 carried out at 1989 changed after the drain boring executed at 1990. The unit-hydrograph of ground-water runoff did not change. The distance between No.1 and the drain boring at 1990 was about 100 m, therefore the sphere of drain boring influence was the same. The time constant of runoff became longer from about 9 hours at Aug. 1989 from about 30 or 40 hours at 1990, 1991 and 1992.It is clear that a small landslide is observed by extensometer and borehole-inclinometer. The unithydrograph of grount-water runoff does not change but the unit-hydrograph of surface runoff and interflow change. Therefore it seems to be the most probable that the ground-water gives rise to a small landslide.

Key concepts: Interflow, Hydrograph, Surface runoff, Extensometer, Hydrology (agriculture), Geology, Landslide, Runoff model

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A runoff function through drain boring — Research Paper | ScholarLens