2012•ECS TransactionsOpen access

Passivation Challenges with Ge and III/V Devices

Sonja Sioncke, Dennis Han-Chung Lin, Laura Nyns, Annelies Delabie, Aaron Voon Yew Thean, Naoto Horiguchi, Herbert Struyf, S. DeGendt, Matty R. Caymax

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Ge and III/V materials are investigated as high mobility channel materials for devices beyond the 14 nm technology node. Passivation of the interface is a prerequisite as dangling bond states trap charges and reduce the mobility. Passivation of the Ge/high-κ interface can be done by using GeO2 as a passivation layer. However, large thicknesses are needed to keep a low defect density. Introduction of S at the interface can solve this issue. Passivation of III/V materials is still a major problem. Oxidation of the III-As surface leads to stress at the surface creating As-As bonds. Oxides can be partially removed by wet treatment or during the ALD deposition. The defects related to As-As bonds cannot be removed by the ALD process. We demonstrate that also for InP, an oxide free interface does not solve the passivation problem.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ge and III/V materials are investigated as high mobility channel materials for devices beyond the 14 nm technology node. Passivation of the interface is a prerequisite as dangling bond states trap charges and reduce the mobility. Passivation of the Ge/high-κ interface can be done by using GeO2 as a passivation layer. However, large thicknesses are needed to keep a low defect density. Introduction of S at the interface can solve this issue. Passivation of III/V materials is still a major problem. Oxidation of the III-As surface leads to stress at the surface creating As-As bonds. Oxides can be partially removed by wet treatment or during the ALD deposition. The defects related to As-As bonds cannot be removed by the ALD process. We demonstrate that also for InP, an oxide free interface does not solve the passivation problem.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ge and III/V materials are investigated as high mobility channel materials for devices beyond the 14 nm technology node. Passivation of the interface is a prerequisite as dangling bond states trap charges and reduce the mobility. Passivation of the Ge/high-κ interface can be done by using GeO2 as a passivation layer. However, large thicknesses are needed to keep a low defect density. Introduction of S at the interface can solve this issue. Passivation of III/V materials is still a major problem. Oxidation of the III-As surface leads to stress at the surface creating As-As bonds. Oxides can be partially removed by wet treatment or during the ALD deposition. The defects related to As-As bonds cannot be removed by the ALD process. We demonstrate that also for InP, an oxide free interface does not solve the passivation problem.

Key concepts: Passivation, Dangling bond, Materials science, Atomic layer deposition, Oxide, Interface (matter), Deposition (geology), Nanotechnology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Passivation Challenges with Ge and III/V Devices — Research Paper | ScholarLens