2004•Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)Requires access

Emancipating a Neo-Liberal Society? Initial Thoughts on the Progressive Pedagogical Heritage in Flanders since the 1960s.

Tom De Coster, Marc Depaepe, Frank A. Simon

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

'To the curriculum historian the importance of reform frequently lies not so much in its achievements as in its symbolism, particularly as reflected back into culture and society'. This is Richard Aldrich's conclusion concerning the England and Wales Educational Reform Act of 1988 and the resulting introduction of the National Curriculum. He observed, correctly, that the National Curriculum, although presented as a radical reform by the then Education minister Kerineth Baker 'was in terms of control, extent, content and form, firmly rooted in the English past. It was essentially backward rather than forward-looking, an attempt to preserve under the guise of change.' In this essay we develop this statement by examining what is left of the 'emancipatory' tradition that manifested itself in the educational landscape of the 1960s. We also consider how much is 'effectively' left in practice of the pedagogical modernism which aimed to deveiop the pre-world war reform movement of the New Education and have an innovative effect on society. In post-war Flanders, and more specifically from the 1970s on, a number of experienced educators drafted a concept for 'new schools', in part because of disaffection with the society that had given rise to the Second World War and, in part also, as a step toward a new, more humane and democratic society. Under the label of Freinet, Montessori, jena Plan, Method, Living or Project School, they sought - inspired by emancipation - to develop an alternative to the regular education. Also within regular

About this research paper

What this paper is about

'To the curriculum historian the importance of reform frequently lies not so much in its achievements as in its symbolism, particularly as reflected back into culture and society'. This is Richard Aldrich's conclusion concerning the England and Wales Educational Reform Act of 1988 and the resulting introduction of the National Curriculum. He observed, correctly, that the National Curriculum, although presented as a radical reform by the then Education minister Kerineth Baker 'was in terms of control, extent, content and form, firmly rooted in the English past. It was essentially backward rather than forward-looking, an attempt to preserve under the guise of change.' In this essay we develop this statement by examining what is left of the 'emancipatory' tradition that manifested itself in the educational landscape of the 1960s. We also consider how much is 'effectively' left in practice of the pedagogical modernism which aimed to deveiop the pre-world war reform movement of the New Education and have an innovative effect on society. In post-war Flanders, and more specifically from the 1970s on, a number of experienced educators drafted a concept for 'new schools', in part because of disaffection with the society that had given rise to the Second World War and, in part also, as a step toward a new, more humane and democratic society. Under the label of Freinet, Montessori, jena Plan, Method, Living or Project School, they sought - inspired by emancipation - to develop an alternative to the regular education. Also within regular

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

'To the curriculum historian the importance of reform frequently lies not so much in its achievements as in its symbolism, particularly as reflected back into culture and society'. This is Richard Aldrich's conclusion concerning the England and Wales Educational Reform Act of 1988 and the resulting introduction of the National Curriculum. He observed, correctly, that the National Curriculum, although presented as a radical reform by the then Education minister Kerineth Baker 'was in terms of control, extent, content and form, firmly rooted in the English past. It was essentially backward rather than forward-looking, an attempt to preserve under the guise of change.' In this essay we develop this statement by examining what is left of the 'emancipatory' tradition that manifested itself in the educational landscape of the 1960s. We also consider how much is 'effectively' left in practice of the pedagogical modernism which aimed to deveiop the pre-world war reform movement of the New Education and have an innovative effect on society. In post-war Flanders, and more specifically from the 1970s on, a number of experienced educators drafted a concept for 'new schools', in part because of disaffection with the society that had given rise to the Second World War and, in part also, as a step toward a new, more humane and democratic society. Under the label of Freinet, Montessori, jena Plan, Method, Living or Project School, they sought - inspired by emancipation - to develop an alternative to the regular education. Also within regular

Key concepts: Emancipation, Curriculum, Modernism (music), Progressive education, Sociology, Democracy, National curriculum, New Right

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Emancipating a Neo-Liberal Society? Initial Thoughts on the Progressive Pedagogical Heritage in Flanders since the 1960s. — Research Paper | ScholarLens