2014•Ecology and SocietyOpen access

Should Sustainability and Resilience Be Combined or Remain Distinct Pursuits?

Charles L. Redman

Open full text 447 citations

Abstract

It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches.Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably.Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future.Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination.Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches.Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably.Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future.Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination.Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 447 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches.Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably.Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future.Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination.Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.

Key concepts: Resilience (materials science), Sustainability, Environmental resource management, Sustainability science, Geography, Environmental planning, Ecology, Social sustainability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Should Sustainability and Resilience Be Combined or Remain Distinct Pursuits? — Research Paper | ScholarLens