2007American Journal of Enology and ViticultureRequires access

Reduction of Malic Acid in Wine Using Natural and Genetically Enhanced Microorganisms

Gary L. Main, Renee T. Threlfall, Justin R. Morris

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

Naturally selected yeast ICV-GRE and 71B, malolactic bacteria Lalvin 31, and genetically enhanced yeast ML01 were compared for biodeacidification of malic acid in production of Vignoles wines. ICV-GRE yeast consumed 18% of malic acid with no lactic acid production. Lalvin 31 added to the wine fermented with ICV-GRE converted the remainder of the malic acid to lactic acid and consumed some citric acid. The ICV-GRE + Lalvin 31 treatment produced less lactic acid compared with the ML01 treatment due to malic acid consumption by the ICV-GRE yeast and had the lowest titratable acidity. ML01 was effective at converting 5.7 g/L (100%) malic to lactic acid during the first 60 hr of fermentation. The 71B yeast consumed 1.9 g/L (33%) of the malic acid with no lactic acid production. Wine produced with ML01 had higher levels of total sulfur dioxide (SO2) than the other treatments. A secondary experiment found that the ML01 yeast produced 34.6 mg/L SO2, which was three times as much as produced by ML01 yeast could be of ICV-GRE and six times as much as 71B. The amount of lactic acid and SO2 concern to enologists depending on style of wine desired.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Naturally selected yeast ICV-GRE and 71B, malolactic bacteria Lalvin 31, and genetically enhanced yeast ML01 were compared for biodeacidification of malic acid in production of Vignoles wines. ICV-GRE yeast consumed 18% of malic acid with no lactic acid production. Lalvin 31 added to the wine fermented with ICV-GRE converted the remainder of the malic acid to lactic acid and consumed some citric acid. The ICV-GRE + Lalvin 31 treatment produced less lactic acid compared with the ML01 treatment due to malic acid consumption by the ICV-GRE yeast and had the lowest titratable acidity. ML01 was effective at converting 5.7 g/L (100%) malic to lactic acid during the first 60 hr of fermentation. The 71B yeast consumed 1.9 g/L (33%) of the malic acid with no lactic acid production. Wine produced with ML01 had higher levels of total sulfur dioxide (SO2) than the other treatments. A secondary experiment found that the ML01 yeast produced 34.6 mg/L SO2, which was three times as much as produced by ML01 yeast could be of ICV-GRE and six times as much as 71B. The amount of lactic acid and SO2 concern to enologists depending on style of wine desired.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Naturally selected yeast ICV-GRE and 71B, malolactic bacteria Lalvin 31, and genetically enhanced yeast ML01 were compared for biodeacidification of malic acid in production of Vignoles wines. ICV-GRE yeast consumed 18% of malic acid with no lactic acid production. Lalvin 31 added to the wine fermented with ICV-GRE converted the remainder of the malic acid to lactic acid and consumed some citric acid. The ICV-GRE + Lalvin 31 treatment produced less lactic acid compared with the ML01 treatment due to malic acid consumption by the ICV-GRE yeast and had the lowest titratable acidity. ML01 was effective at converting 5.7 g/L (100%) malic to lactic acid during the first 60 hr of fermentation. The 71B yeast consumed 1.9 g/L (33%) of the malic acid with no lactic acid production. Wine produced with ML01 had higher levels of total sulfur dioxide (SO2) than the other treatments. A secondary experiment found that the ML01 yeast produced 34.6 mg/L SO2, which was three times as much as produced by ML01 yeast could be of ICV-GRE and six times as much as 71B. The amount of lactic acid and SO2 concern to enologists depending on style of wine desired.

Key concepts: Malic acid, Malolactic fermentation, Lactic acid, Wine fault, Food science, Yeast, Fermentation, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reduction of Malic Acid in Wine Using Natural and Genetically Enhanced Microorganisms — Research Paper | ScholarLens