2014•Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version)Requires access

学术评价应更科学

Erdan Dong, Hai Feng Hu, Jun ZHANG

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Research assessments make value judgments on the results of academic activities. In China, the existing research assessment models have become increasingly unsuited to the rapid development of science and technology. Here we discuss the essence and basic principles of research assessment. We demonstrate the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of two popular models for research assessment: one based on the scientific content and the other based on the form of academic achievement. We then review the current situation and problems of research assessment in Western countries, as well as the current problems in China. We propose the principles and corresponding institutional improvements that should follow upon changing research assessment from a form-based to content-based model. We also discuss the changes and improvements that should be considered in medical research assessment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Research assessments make value judgments on the results of academic activities. In China, the existing research assessment models have become increasingly unsuited to the rapid development of science and technology. Here we discuss the essence and basic principles of research assessment. We demonstrate the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of two popular models for research assessment: one based on the scientific content and the other based on the form of academic achievement. We then review the current situation and problems of research assessment in Western countries, as well as the current problems in China. We propose the principles and corresponding institutional improvements that should follow upon changing research assessment from a form-based to content-based model. We also discuss the changes and improvements that should be considered in medical research assessment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Research assessments make value judgments on the results of academic activities. In China, the existing research assessment models have become increasingly unsuited to the rapid development of science and technology. Here we discuss the essence and basic principles of research assessment. We demonstrate the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of two popular models for research assessment: one based on the scientific content and the other based on the form of academic achievement. We then review the current situation and problems of research assessment in Western countries, as well as the current problems in China. We propose the principles and corresponding institutional improvements that should follow upon changing research assessment from a form-based to content-based model. We also discuss the changes and improvements that should be considered in medical research assessment.

Key concepts: Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
学术评价应更科学 — Research Paper | ScholarLens