2014•Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

Creative Destruction: Evidence From Initial Public Offerings

Douglas R. Miller, Kun Liu

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Joseph Schumpeter coined the term “creative destruction” to characterize the impact of innovation on existing organizations. According to this perspective, creative destruction is driven by a firm’s introduction of discontinuous technology. We seek to extend this research by examining creative destruction pressures as they arise. We identify the impact that creative destruction pressures have when they are first felt by competitors. In addition to this, we develop theory to explain when these creative destruction pressures will be more severe. We hypothesize that incumbent firms are negatively impacted by market entrance of competitors. This impact will be more severe when the entering firm’s technology is new to the industry. In contrast, we hypothesize that incumbent firms which utilize coping mechanisms will be better able to withstand creative destruction pressures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Joseph Schumpeter coined the term “creative destruction” to characterize the impact of innovation on existing organizations. According to this perspective, creative destruction is driven by a firm’s introduction of discontinuous technology. We seek to extend this research by examining creative destruction pressures as they arise. We identify the impact that creative destruction pressures have when they are first felt by competitors. In addition to this, we develop theory to explain when these creative destruction pressures will be more severe. We hypothesize that incumbent firms are negatively impacted by market entrance of competitors. This impact will be more severe when the entering firm’s technology is new to the industry. In contrast, we hypothesize that incumbent firms which utilize coping mechanisms will be better able to withstand creative destruction pressures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Joseph Schumpeter coined the term “creative destruction” to characterize the impact of innovation on existing organizations. According to this perspective, creative destruction is driven by a firm’s introduction of discontinuous technology. We seek to extend this research by examining creative destruction pressures as they arise. We identify the impact that creative destruction pressures have when they are first felt by competitors. In addition to this, we develop theory to explain when these creative destruction pressures will be more severe. We hypothesize that incumbent firms are negatively impacted by market entrance of competitors. This impact will be more severe when the entering firm’s technology is new to the industry. In contrast, we hypothesize that incumbent firms which utilize coping mechanisms will be better able to withstand creative destruction pressures.

Key concepts: Creative destruction, Competitor analysis, Perspective (graphical), Creative industries, Coping (psychology), Business, Industrial organization, Marketing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Creative Destruction: Evidence From Initial Public Offerings — Research Paper | ScholarLens