Divergence in Firms: How Technology Convergence Relate to Organizational Boundaries
Deniz Tunçalp, Mehmet Erçek
Abstract
Deniz Tunçalp, Mehmet Erçek
Abstract
Research in industrial organization and organizational theory has long studied the dynamics of industry and organizational evolution. Yet, we do not know how organizational boundaries of competing firms co-evolve when previously distinct technologies converge, bringing standards, products/services, markets and industries together. Drawing on the Transaction Cost Theory and the larger framework of Market Failure (Williamson, 1975; 2010), we explain how various types of convergence attend differently to the rearrangement of organizational boundaries in firms with different positions in value-chains and in markets. Based on a new convergence taxonomy and a sequential hierarchy that accounts for related contingencies, we develop a theoretical model that explains where and how organizational boundaries change as convergence proceeds. We also argue that the direction of convergence, towards either higher or lower market failure potential, is also a significant variable in understanding boundary dynamics during convergence. In conclusion, we discuss how different types of convergence can be accounted for, while making boundary decisions in different organizations, together with theoretical implications and potential further research.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Research in industrial organization and organizational theory has long studied the dynamics of industry and organizational evolution. Yet, we do not know how organizational boundaries of competing firms co-evolve when previously distinct technologies converge, bringing standards, products/services, markets and industries together. Drawing on the Transaction Cost Theory and the larger framework of Market Failure (Williamson, 1975; 2010), we explain how various types of convergence attend differently to the rearrangement of organizational boundaries in firms with different positions in value-chains and in markets. Based on a new convergence taxonomy and a sequential hierarchy that accounts for related contingencies, we develop a theoretical model that explains where and how organizational boundaries change as convergence proceeds. We also argue that the direction of convergence, towards either higher or lower market failure potential, is also a significant variable in understanding boundary dynamics during convergence. In conclusion, we discuss how different types of convergence can be accounted for, while making boundary decisions in different organizations, together with theoretical implications and potential further research.
Key concepts: Convergence (economics), Divergence (linguistics), Transaction cost, Industrial organization, Organizational learning, Hierarchy, Database transaction, Symbolic convergence theory