2014•Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

Divergence in Firms: How Technology Convergence Relate to Organizational Boundaries

Deniz Tunçalp, Mehmet Erçek

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Research in industrial organization and organizational theory has long studied the dynamics of industry and organizational evolution. Yet, we do not know how organizational boundaries of competing firms co-evolve when previously distinct technologies converge, bringing standards, products/services, markets and industries together. Drawing on the Transaction Cost Theory and the larger framework of Market Failure (Williamson, 1975; 2010), we explain how various types of convergence attend differently to the rearrangement of organizational boundaries in firms with different positions in value-chains and in markets. Based on a new convergence taxonomy and a sequential hierarchy that accounts for related contingencies, we develop a theoretical model that explains where and how organizational boundaries change as convergence proceeds. We also argue that the direction of convergence, towards either higher or lower market failure potential, is also a significant variable in understanding boundary dynamics during convergence. In conclusion, we discuss how different types of convergence can be accounted for, while making boundary decisions in different organizations, together with theoretical implications and potential further research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Research in industrial organization and organizational theory has long studied the dynamics of industry and organizational evolution. Yet, we do not know how organizational boundaries of competing firms co-evolve when previously distinct technologies converge, bringing standards, products/services, markets and industries together. Drawing on the Transaction Cost Theory and the larger framework of Market Failure (Williamson, 1975; 2010), we explain how various types of convergence attend differently to the rearrangement of organizational boundaries in firms with different positions in value-chains and in markets. Based on a new convergence taxonomy and a sequential hierarchy that accounts for related contingencies, we develop a theoretical model that explains where and how organizational boundaries change as convergence proceeds. We also argue that the direction of convergence, towards either higher or lower market failure potential, is also a significant variable in understanding boundary dynamics during convergence. In conclusion, we discuss how different types of convergence can be accounted for, while making boundary decisions in different organizations, together with theoretical implications and potential further research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Research in industrial organization and organizational theory has long studied the dynamics of industry and organizational evolution. Yet, we do not know how organizational boundaries of competing firms co-evolve when previously distinct technologies converge, bringing standards, products/services, markets and industries together. Drawing on the Transaction Cost Theory and the larger framework of Market Failure (Williamson, 1975; 2010), we explain how various types of convergence attend differently to the rearrangement of organizational boundaries in firms with different positions in value-chains and in markets. Based on a new convergence taxonomy and a sequential hierarchy that accounts for related contingencies, we develop a theoretical model that explains where and how organizational boundaries change as convergence proceeds. We also argue that the direction of convergence, towards either higher or lower market failure potential, is also a significant variable in understanding boundary dynamics during convergence. In conclusion, we discuss how different types of convergence can be accounted for, while making boundary decisions in different organizations, together with theoretical implications and potential further research.

Key concepts: Convergence (economics), Divergence (linguistics), Transaction cost, Industrial organization, Organizational learning, Hierarchy, Database transaction, Symbolic convergence theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Divergence in Firms: How Technology Convergence Relate to Organizational Boundaries — Research Paper | ScholarLens