1997Practica Oto-Rhino-LaryngologicaOpen access

Delayed Response Following Cochlear Microphonics; Its Clinical Significance.

Masutoshi Nishikawa, Keiko Nishikawa

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Transtympanic electrocochleography (ECoG) with 1000Hz tone-bursts and clicks was performed in 262 patients (262 ears) who visited the JA Yamaguchi Shuto General Hospital.The cochlear microphonics (CM), action potentials (AP) and summation potentials (SP) were analyzed.1) There were some patients with a delayed response following the tone-burst evoked CM, but others did not show such a delayed response.2) Delayed responses following a tone-burst evoked CM were frequently evoked in patients with a normal hearing level and in patients with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss.3) Patients with a delayed response following a tone-burst evoked CM appeared to have a better overall hearing level, lower click-evoked AP detection thresholds and a larger click-evoked AP amplitude than those without a delayed response.4) The tone-burst evoked CM detection thresholds were correlated with pure tone thresholds at a frequency of 1000Hz, and with the average pure tone hearing level within a frequency range of 500-4000Hz.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Transtympanic electrocochleography (ECoG) with 1000Hz tone-bursts and clicks was performed in 262 patients (262 ears) who visited the JA Yamaguchi Shuto General Hospital.The cochlear microphonics (CM), action potentials (AP) and summation potentials (SP) were analyzed.1) There were some patients with a delayed response following the tone-burst evoked CM, but others did not show such a delayed response.2) Delayed responses following a tone-burst evoked CM were frequently evoked in patients with a normal hearing level and in patients with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss.3) Patients with a delayed response following a tone-burst evoked CM appeared to have a better overall hearing level, lower click-evoked AP detection thresholds and a larger click-evoked AP amplitude than those without a delayed response.4) The tone-burst evoked CM detection thresholds were correlated with pure tone thresholds at a frequency of 1000Hz, and with the average pure tone hearing level within a frequency range of 500-4000Hz.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Transtympanic electrocochleography (ECoG) with 1000Hz tone-bursts and clicks was performed in 262 patients (262 ears) who visited the JA Yamaguchi Shuto General Hospital.The cochlear microphonics (CM), action potentials (AP) and summation potentials (SP) were analyzed.1) There were some patients with a delayed response following the tone-burst evoked CM, but others did not show such a delayed response.2) Delayed responses following a tone-burst evoked CM were frequently evoked in patients with a normal hearing level and in patients with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss.3) Patients with a delayed response following a tone-burst evoked CM appeared to have a better overall hearing level, lower click-evoked AP detection thresholds and a larger click-evoked AP amplitude than those without a delayed response.4) The tone-burst evoked CM detection thresholds were correlated with pure tone thresholds at a frequency of 1000Hz, and with the average pure tone hearing level within a frequency range of 500-4000Hz.

Key concepts: Microphonics, Electrocochleography, Tone burst, Audiology, Medicine, Tone (literature), Hearing loss, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Delayed Response Following Cochlear Microphonics; Its Clinical Significance. — Research Paper | ScholarLens