2005Kansenshogaku zasshiOpen access

Evaluation of Seven Immunological Assay Reagents for Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen (HBsAg) in the Sensitivity and the Detection of HBsAg Mutants.

Matsuo Deguchi, Masanori Kagita, Seishi Asari, Yoshinori Iwatani, Takahiko TUCHIDA, Kazushige IINUMA, Mark Sanborn

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Mutants of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) are known as a cause of false-negative results in diagnostic tests for HBsAg; particularly when a diagnostic kit utilizes monoclonal antibodies to detect HBsAg. We compared seven HBsAg kits with regard to sensitivity for HBsAg subtypes (ad, ay) and their ability to detect nine different HBsAg mutants. Among them, the sensitivities of five kits were high and comparable to each other (0.2 - 0.3ng/ml). However, two kits were of lower sensitivity (0.8-1.3ng/ml, and 2.4-2.5ng/ml, respectively). Two kits, produced by the same company, reacted with all of the nine HBsAg mutants, but five kits showed false-negative results with one or more of the HBsAg mutants. These data indicate that there are differences in the detection sensitivities for HBsAg and abilities to detect HBsAg mutants among commercially available HBsAg kits, which may explain false-negative clinical results.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mutants of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) are known as a cause of false-negative results in diagnostic tests for HBsAg; particularly when a diagnostic kit utilizes monoclonal antibodies to detect HBsAg. We compared seven HBsAg kits with regard to sensitivity for HBsAg subtypes (ad, ay) and their ability to detect nine different HBsAg mutants. Among them, the sensitivities of five kits were high and comparable to each other (0.2 - 0.3ng/ml). However, two kits were of lower sensitivity (0.8-1.3ng/ml, and 2.4-2.5ng/ml, respectively). Two kits, produced by the same company, reacted with all of the nine HBsAg mutants, but five kits showed false-negative results with one or more of the HBsAg mutants. These data indicate that there are differences in the detection sensitivities for HBsAg and abilities to detect HBsAg mutants among commercially available HBsAg kits, which may explain false-negative clinical results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mutants of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) are known as a cause of false-negative results in diagnostic tests for HBsAg; particularly when a diagnostic kit utilizes monoclonal antibodies to detect HBsAg. We compared seven HBsAg kits with regard to sensitivity for HBsAg subtypes (ad, ay) and their ability to detect nine different HBsAg mutants. Among them, the sensitivities of five kits were high and comparable to each other (0.2 - 0.3ng/ml). However, two kits were of lower sensitivity (0.8-1.3ng/ml, and 2.4-2.5ng/ml, respectively). Two kits, produced by the same company, reacted with all of the nine HBsAg mutants, but five kits showed false-negative results with one or more of the HBsAg mutants. These data indicate that there are differences in the detection sensitivities for HBsAg and abilities to detect HBsAg mutants among commercially available HBsAg kits, which may explain false-negative clinical results.

Key concepts: HBsAg, Hepatitis B virus, Virology, Medicine, Mutant, Monoclonal antibody, Antigen, Virus

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Seven Immunological Assay Reagents for Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen (HBsAg) in the Sensitivity and the Detection of HBsAg Mutants. — Research Paper | ScholarLens