2013•Experimental and Clinical TransplantationRequires access

Renal Recovery After Conversion to an Everolimus-Based Immunosuppression in Early and Late Heart Transplant Recipients: A 12-Month Analysis

Sebastian G. Michel, Amir K. Bigdeli, Christian M. Hagl, Bruno Meiser, Ingo Kaczmarek

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity reduces long-term patient survival after heart transplant. Proliferation signal inhibitors, in combination with or replacing calcineurin inhibitors, may preserve or improve renal function. We evaluated the effect of calcineurin inhibitor-reduction and withdrawal in everolimus-based immunosuppression on renal function after a heart transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with creatinine clearance < 1 mL/s (60 mL/min) were switched from tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to low-dose tacrolimus/everolimus if their heart transplant was ≤ 1 year ago (group 1, n=13) and to everolimus/mycophenolate mofetil if their heart transplant was > 1 year ago (group 2, n=11). Serum creatinine levels and calculated creatinine clearance were analyzed up to 12 months after conversion. RESULTS: The switch in immunosuppression was associated with a significant decrease/increase of serum creatinine/creatinine clearance in both groups between baseline and month 12 (group 1, creatinine, 221.0 ± 70.7 to 159.1 ± 44.2 μmol/L (2.5 ± 0.8 to 1.8 ± 0.5 mg/dL); creatinine clearance, 0.75 ± 0.45 to 1.01 ± 0.50 mL/s (45.1 ± 26.7 to 60.5 ± 29.7 mL/min) (P < .01 each); group 2, creatinine, 247.5 ± 79.6 to 159.1 ± 44.2 μmol/L (2.8 ± 0.9 to 1.8 ± 0.5 mg/dL), creatinine clearance, 0.57 ± 0.23 to 0.93 ± 0.33 mL/s (34.1 ± 13.8 to 55.7 ± 19.6 mL/min) [P < .05 each]) with no significant group difference in the creatinine and the creatinine clearance levels after switching. No acute rejections or deaths occurred during the 12-month follow-up. Four patients (36.4%) from group 2 and 1 patient (7.7%) from group 1 discontinued everolimus because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus allows calcineurin inhibitor-reduction and withdrawal after a heart transplant, resulting in improved renal function. However, adverse effects are common and lead to a high reconversion rate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES: Calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity reduces long-term patient survival after heart transplant. Proliferation signal inhibitors, in combination with or replacing calcineurin inhibitors, may preserve or improve renal function. We evaluated the effect of calcineurin inhibitor-reduction and withdrawal in everolimus-based immunosuppression on renal function after a heart transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with creatinine clearance < 1 mL/s (60 mL/min) were switched from tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to low-dose tacrolimus/everolimus if their heart transplant was ≤ 1 year ago (group 1, n=13) and to everolimus/mycophenolate mofetil if their heart transplant was > 1 year ago (group 2, n=11). Serum creatinine levels and calculated creatinine clearance were analyzed up to 12 months after conversion. RESULTS: The switch in immunosuppression was associated with a significant decrease/increase of serum creatinine/creatinine clearance in both groups between baseline and month 12 (group 1, creatinine, 221.0 ± 70.7 to 159.1 ± 44.2 μmol/L (2.5 ± 0.8 to 1.8 ± 0.5 mg/dL); creatinine clearance, 0.75 ± 0.45 to 1.01 ± 0.50 mL/s (45.1 ± 26.7 to 60.5 ± 29.7 mL/min) (P < .01 each); group 2, creatinine, 247.5 ± 79.6 to 159.1 ± 44.2 μmol/L (2.8 ± 0.9 to 1.8 ± 0.5 mg/dL), creatinine clearance, 0.57 ± 0.23 to 0.93 ± 0.33 mL/s (34.1 ± 13.8 to 55.7 ± 19.6 mL/min) [P < .05 each]) with no significant group difference in the creatinine and the creatinine clearance levels after switching. No acute rejections or deaths occurred during the 12-month follow-up. Four patients (36.4%) from group 2 and 1 patient (7.7%) from group 1 discontinued everolimus because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus allows calcineurin inhibitor-reduction and withdrawal after a heart transplant, resulting in improved renal function. However, adverse effects are common and lead to a high reconversion rate.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES: Calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity reduces long-term patient survival after heart transplant. Proliferation signal inhibitors, in combination with or replacing calcineurin inhibitors, may preserve or improve renal function. We evaluated the effect of calcineurin inhibitor-reduction and withdrawal in everolimus-based immunosuppression on renal function after a heart transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with creatinine clearance < 1 mL/s (60 mL/min) were switched from tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil to low-dose tacrolimus/everolimus if their heart transplant was ≤ 1 year ago (group 1, n=13) and to everolimus/mycophenolate mofetil if their heart transplant was > 1 year ago (group 2, n=11). Serum creatinine levels and calculated creatinine clearance were analyzed up to 12 months after conversion. RESULTS: The switch in immunosuppression was associated with a significant decrease/increase of serum creatinine/creatinine clearance in both groups between baseline and month 12 (group 1, creatinine, 221.0 ± 70.7 to 159.1 ± 44.2 μmol/L (2.5 ± 0.8 to 1.8 ± 0.5 mg/dL); creatinine clearance, 0.75 ± 0.45 to 1.01 ± 0.50 mL/s (45.1 ± 26.7 to 60.5 ± 29.7 mL/min) (P < .01 each); group 2, creatinine, 247.5 ± 79.6 to 159.1 ± 44.2 μmol/L (2.8 ± 0.9 to 1.8 ± 0.5 mg/dL), creatinine clearance, 0.57 ± 0.23 to 0.93 ± 0.33 mL/s (34.1 ± 13.8 to 55.7 ± 19.6 mL/min) [P < .05 each]) with no significant group difference in the creatinine and the creatinine clearance levels after switching. No acute rejections or deaths occurred during the 12-month follow-up. Four patients (36.4%) from group 2 and 1 patient (7.7%) from group 1 discontinued everolimus because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus allows calcineurin inhibitor-reduction and withdrawal after a heart transplant, resulting in improved renal function. However, adverse effects are common and lead to a high reconversion rate.

Key concepts: Calcineurin, Creatinine, Everolimus, Immunosuppression, Urology, Renal function, Medicine, Nephrotoxicity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Renal Recovery After Conversion to an Everolimus-Based Immunosuppression in Early and Late Heart Transplant Recipients: A 12-Month Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens