1982Clinical Infectious DiseasesRequires access

Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections with Cefotaxime: Noncomparative and Prospective Comparative Trials

Paul O. Madsen

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Three studies evaluated the efficacy of cefotaxime for the treatment of urinary tract infections. An open, multicenter, noncomparative trial included 477 patients who received a usual dose of 2 g of intravenous or intramuscular cefotaxime daily for five to 10 days. The maximal daily dosage in severe cases was 12 g. Pathogens included Escherichia coli and species of Citrobacter, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Serratia, Morganella, Providencia, and Proteus. Of all the causative organisms, 83.6% were eradicated in the 271 patients who could be evaluated. The other two studies were prospective, randomized comparisons of cefotaxime (392 patients) with cefazolin (250 patients) for the treatment of urinary tract infections caused by microorganisms susceptible to both antibiotics. The treatment schedule was the same as that in the first study. Results of these two prospective studies were pooled. Cefotaxime eradicated 90% of all pathogens, and cefazolin eradicated 72%. Cefotaxime was significantly more effective (P less than 0.01) than cefazolin in eradicating E. coli and Proteus mirabilis. A satisfactory clinical response was obtained in 98.1% of patients given cefotaxime and in 87.6% of those given cefazolin (P less than 0.01).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three studies evaluated the efficacy of cefotaxime for the treatment of urinary tract infections. An open, multicenter, noncomparative trial included 477 patients who received a usual dose of 2 g of intravenous or intramuscular cefotaxime daily for five to 10 days. The maximal daily dosage in severe cases was 12 g. Pathogens included Escherichia coli and species of Citrobacter, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Serratia, Morganella, Providencia, and Proteus. Of all the causative organisms, 83.6% were eradicated in the 271 patients who could be evaluated. The other two studies were prospective, randomized comparisons of cefotaxime (392 patients) with cefazolin (250 patients) for the treatment of urinary tract infections caused by microorganisms susceptible to both antibiotics. The treatment schedule was the same as that in the first study. Results of these two prospective studies were pooled. Cefotaxime eradicated 90% of all pathogens, and cefazolin eradicated 72%. Cefotaxime was significantly more effective (P less than 0.01) than cefazolin in eradicating E. coli and Proteus mirabilis. A satisfactory clinical response was obtained in 98.1% of patients given cefotaxime and in 87.6% of those given cefazolin (P less than 0.01).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three studies evaluated the efficacy of cefotaxime for the treatment of urinary tract infections. An open, multicenter, noncomparative trial included 477 patients who received a usual dose of 2 g of intravenous or intramuscular cefotaxime daily for five to 10 days. The maximal daily dosage in severe cases was 12 g. Pathogens included Escherichia coli and species of Citrobacter, Pseudomonas, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Serratia, Morganella, Providencia, and Proteus. Of all the causative organisms, 83.6% were eradicated in the 271 patients who could be evaluated. The other two studies were prospective, randomized comparisons of cefotaxime (392 patients) with cefazolin (250 patients) for the treatment of urinary tract infections caused by microorganisms susceptible to both antibiotics. The treatment schedule was the same as that in the first study. Results of these two prospective studies were pooled. Cefotaxime eradicated 90% of all pathogens, and cefazolin eradicated 72%. Cefotaxime was significantly more effective (P less than 0.01) than cefazolin in eradicating E. coli and Proteus mirabilis. A satisfactory clinical response was obtained in 98.1% of patients given cefotaxime and in 87.6% of those given cefazolin (P less than 0.01).

Key concepts: Cefotaxime, Cefazolin, Proteus mirabilis, Medicine, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Antibiotics, Urinary system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections with Cefotaxime: Noncomparative and Prospective Comparative Trials — Research Paper | ScholarLens