1966•Journal of Economic EntomologyRequires access

Face Fly and Horn Fly Control on Cattle—1962-6412

C. K. Dorsey, J. O. Heishmann, Chris Cunningham

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Investigations were conducted during the fly seasons in 1962, 1963, and 1964 to control the face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer, and the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.), with various insecticides applied under field conditions. Self-treatment devices such as the 3-cable back rubber and dust bags were used mainly; some salt-insecticide mixtures were included. The insecticides included in the fly-control applications were: ronnel, coumaphos, dichlorvos, carbaryl, diazinon, malathion, lindane, methoxychlor, dimethoate, dimetilan, Silikil® (amorphous silica gel 95.5%, ammonium fluosilicate 1.5%, inert ingredients 3.0%), azinphosmethyl, trichlorfon; fenthion; Baygon® (O-isopropoxyphenyl methylcarbamate); Ciodrin® (alpha-methylbenzyl 3-hydroxycrotanate dimethyl phosphate); famphur; Bayer 37344 (4-(methylthio)-3,5-xylyl methylcarbamate); and Imidan® (O, O-dimethyl S-phthalimidomethyl phosphorodithioate). The most effective treatments for face fly reduction were hand-applied dust treatments of azinphosmethyl 50.0% WP, Ciodrin 5.0%, dimetilan 50.0% WP, and dust-bag-applications with azinphosmethyl (10.0 and 2.0%) and Baygon (2.0%). The azinphosmethyl (2.0%) back rubber also was effective. Three-cable back rubber applications provided excellent horn fly control with methoxychlor (2.0%), Imidan (2.0%), malathion (2.0%), dimethoate (2.0%), and fenthion (2.0%). Horn fly control with Baygon (2.0%) and fenthion (2.0%) dust bags also was excellent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Investigations were conducted during the fly seasons in 1962, 1963, and 1964 to control the face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer, and the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.), with various insecticides applied under field conditions. Self-treatment devices such as the 3-cable back rubber and dust bags were used mainly; some salt-insecticide mixtures were included. The insecticides included in the fly-control applications were: ronnel, coumaphos, dichlorvos, carbaryl, diazinon, malathion, lindane, methoxychlor, dimethoate, dimetilan, Silikil® (amorphous silica gel 95.5%, ammonium fluosilicate 1.5%, inert ingredients 3.0%), azinphosmethyl, trichlorfon; fenthion; Baygon® (O-isopropoxyphenyl methylcarbamate); Ciodrin® (alpha-methylbenzyl 3-hydroxycrotanate dimethyl phosphate); famphur; Bayer 37344 (4-(methylthio)-3,5-xylyl methylcarbamate); and Imidan® (O, O-dimethyl S-phthalimidomethyl phosphorodithioate). The most effective treatments for face fly reduction were hand-applied dust treatments of azinphosmethyl 50.0% WP, Ciodrin 5.0%, dimetilan 50.0% WP, and dust-bag-applications with azinphosmethyl (10.0 and 2.0%) and Baygon (2.0%). The azinphosmethyl (2.0%) back rubber also was effective. Three-cable back rubber applications provided excellent horn fly control with methoxychlor (2.0%), Imidan (2.0%), malathion (2.0%), dimethoate (2.0%), and fenthion (2.0%). Horn fly control with Baygon (2.0%) and fenthion (2.0%) dust bags also was excellent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Investigations were conducted during the fly seasons in 1962, 1963, and 1964 to control the face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer, and the horn fly, Haematobia irritans (L.), with various insecticides applied under field conditions. Self-treatment devices such as the 3-cable back rubber and dust bags were used mainly; some salt-insecticide mixtures were included. The insecticides included in the fly-control applications were: ronnel, coumaphos, dichlorvos, carbaryl, diazinon, malathion, lindane, methoxychlor, dimethoate, dimetilan, Silikil® (amorphous silica gel 95.5%, ammonium fluosilicate 1.5%, inert ingredients 3.0%), azinphosmethyl, trichlorfon; fenthion; Baygon® (O-isopropoxyphenyl methylcarbamate); Ciodrin® (alpha-methylbenzyl 3-hydroxycrotanate dimethyl phosphate); famphur; Bayer 37344 (4-(methylthio)-3,5-xylyl methylcarbamate); and Imidan® (O, O-dimethyl S-phthalimidomethyl phosphorodithioate). The most effective treatments for face fly reduction were hand-applied dust treatments of azinphosmethyl 50.0% WP, Ciodrin 5.0%, dimetilan 50.0% WP, and dust-bag-applications with azinphosmethyl (10.0 and 2.0%) and Baygon (2.0%). The azinphosmethyl (2.0%) back rubber also was effective. Three-cable back rubber applications provided excellent horn fly control with methoxychlor (2.0%), Imidan (2.0%), malathion (2.0%), dimethoate (2.0%), and fenthion (2.0%). Horn fly control with Baygon (2.0%) and fenthion (2.0%) dust bags also was excellent.

Key concepts: Fenthion, Diazinon, Methoxychlor, Coumaphos, Toxicology, Malathion, Dimethoate, Dichlorvos

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Face Fly and Horn Fly Control on Cattle—1962-6412 — Research Paper | ScholarLens