2008Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)Requires access

Sex differences in nepotism

Katinka Quintelier

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Certain data suggest that women are more nepotistic than men (e.g. Neyer and Lang, 2003; Faulkner and Schaller, 2007). This is consistent with evolutionary theory: (1) Hamilton’s rule predicts that helping behavior is preferentially directed to more closely related individuals, when the benefit is higher or when the cost of helping is lower. (2) The theory of sexual selection predicts a sex difference in the pay-off in helping kin since men incur a cost of lost mating opportunities and men also face paternity uncertainty. Therefore, women will show more willingness to help kin than men. However, research on the proximate mediators of nepotism does not always find consistent sex differences in helping behavior towards kin. I will present data on sex differences in nepotism and interpret these data in light of inclusive fitness theory, sexual selection and hypotheses about the mental mediators of nepotism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Certain data suggest that women are more nepotistic than men (e.g. Neyer and Lang, 2003; Faulkner and Schaller, 2007). This is consistent with evolutionary theory: (1) Hamilton’s rule predicts that helping behavior is preferentially directed to more closely related individuals, when the benefit is higher or when the cost of helping is lower. (2) The theory of sexual selection predicts a sex difference in the pay-off in helping kin since men incur a cost of lost mating opportunities and men also face paternity uncertainty. Therefore, women will show more willingness to help kin than men. However, research on the proximate mediators of nepotism does not always find consistent sex differences in helping behavior towards kin. I will present data on sex differences in nepotism and interpret these data in light of inclusive fitness theory, sexual selection and hypotheses about the mental mediators of nepotism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Certain data suggest that women are more nepotistic than men (e.g. Neyer and Lang, 2003; Faulkner and Schaller, 2007). This is consistent with evolutionary theory: (1) Hamilton’s rule predicts that helping behavior is preferentially directed to more closely related individuals, when the benefit is higher or when the cost of helping is lower. (2) The theory of sexual selection predicts a sex difference in the pay-off in helping kin since men incur a cost of lost mating opportunities and men also face paternity uncertainty. Therefore, women will show more willingness to help kin than men. However, research on the proximate mediators of nepotism does not always find consistent sex differences in helping behavior towards kin. I will present data on sex differences in nepotism and interpret these data in light of inclusive fitness theory, sexual selection and hypotheses about the mental mediators of nepotism.

Key concepts: Nepotism, Kin selection, Inclusive fitness, Social psychology, Kin recognition, Face (sociological concept), Sexual selection, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sex differences in nepotism — Research Paper | ScholarLens