2012•The Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeonRequires access

Treatment of functional mitral regurgitation – Intervention or surgery?

Lenard Conradi, Paul Graumüller, Hendrick Treede, Moritz Seiffert, Stephan Ernst Baldus, Volker Rudolph, Johannes M. Schirmer, FM Wagner, Stefan Blankenberg, Hermann C. Reichenspurner

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Corrective surgery for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) by restrictive annuloplasty has proven beneficial in that it improves NYHA functional class and induces reverse remodeling. However, proof of a survival benefit for such patients is still pending. Percutaneous techniques of mitral valve repair (MVR) may become a viable treatment alternative for high-risk patients with severe FMR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our prospective hospital database of patients with severe FMR undergoing either surgical MVR or percutaneous treatment using the MitraClip™ device. Patient characteristics and 6 months outcomes are reported. Results: From March 2002 through June 2010 76 patients underwent isolated surgical MVR for FMR while 69 patients were treated using the MitraClip™ device. Patients undergoing MitraClip™ treatment were significantly older (73.0 vs. 64.5 years, p<0.0001), had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (37.0% vs. 40.4%, p=0.15), and were generally more high-risk with significantly higher mean EuroSCOREs compared to surgical candidates (33.0% vs. 10.3%, p<0.0001). Mortality was 5.9% and 3.3% at 30 days, and 11.8 and 4.8% at 6 months (p=0.16) for intervention and surgery respectively. Freedom from MR ≤ II at 180 days was 94.7% after MVR and 76.8% after MitraClip™ therapy (p=0.007). Conclusions: In our experience, characteristics and risk factors of patients with severe FMR undergoing surgery differ significantly from those considered for interventional therapy. At 6 months, surgery is more effective compared to MitraClip™ in reducing MR. However, a large proportion of patients benefits from intervention with sustained MR ≤ II. Especially for elderly patients with reduced left ventricular function and relevant comorbidities, MitraClip™ therapy seems an adequate alternative to surgery. Assessment, treatment and postprocedural care of patients by an interdisciplinary team is of paramount importance for clinical success.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: Corrective surgery for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) by restrictive annuloplasty has proven beneficial in that it improves NYHA functional class and induces reverse remodeling. However, proof of a survival benefit for such patients is still pending. Percutaneous techniques of mitral valve repair (MVR) may become a viable treatment alternative for high-risk patients with severe FMR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our prospective hospital database of patients with severe FMR undergoing either surgical MVR or percutaneous treatment using the MitraClip™ device. Patient characteristics and 6 months outcomes are reported. Results: From March 2002 through June 2010 76 patients underwent isolated surgical MVR for FMR while 69 patients were treated using the MitraClip™ device. Patients undergoing MitraClip™ treatment were significantly older (73.0 vs. 64.5 years, p<0.0001), had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (37.0% vs. 40.4%, p=0.15), and were generally more high-risk with significantly higher mean EuroSCOREs compared to surgical candidates (33.0% vs. 10.3%, p<0.0001). Mortality was 5.9% and 3.3% at 30 days, and 11.8 and 4.8% at 6 months (p=0.16) for intervention and surgery respectively. Freedom from MR ≤ II at 180 days was 94.7% after MVR and 76.8% after MitraClip™ therapy (p=0.007). Conclusions: In our experience, characteristics and risk factors of patients with severe FMR undergoing surgery differ significantly from those considered for interventional therapy. At 6 months, surgery is more effective compared to MitraClip™ in reducing MR. However, a large proportion of patients benefits from intervention with sustained MR ≤ II. Especially for elderly patients with reduced left ventricular function and relevant comorbidities, MitraClip™ therapy seems an adequate alternative to surgery. Assessment, treatment and postprocedural care of patients by an interdisciplinary team is of paramount importance for clinical success.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: Corrective surgery for functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) by restrictive annuloplasty has proven beneficial in that it improves NYHA functional class and induces reverse remodeling. However, proof of a survival benefit for such patients is still pending. Percutaneous techniques of mitral valve repair (MVR) may become a viable treatment alternative for high-risk patients with severe FMR. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our prospective hospital database of patients with severe FMR undergoing either surgical MVR or percutaneous treatment using the MitraClip™ device. Patient characteristics and 6 months outcomes are reported. Results: From March 2002 through June 2010 76 patients underwent isolated surgical MVR for FMR while 69 patients were treated using the MitraClip™ device. Patients undergoing MitraClip™ treatment were significantly older (73.0 vs. 64.5 years, p<0.0001), had a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (37.0% vs. 40.4%, p=0.15), and were generally more high-risk with significantly higher mean EuroSCOREs compared to surgical candidates (33.0% vs. 10.3%, p<0.0001). Mortality was 5.9% and 3.3% at 30 days, and 11.8 and 4.8% at 6 months (p=0.16) for intervention and surgery respectively. Freedom from MR ≤ II at 180 days was 94.7% after MVR and 76.8% after MitraClip™ therapy (p=0.007). Conclusions: In our experience, characteristics and risk factors of patients with severe FMR undergoing surgery differ significantly from those considered for interventional therapy. At 6 months, surgery is more effective compared to MitraClip™ in reducing MR. However, a large proportion of patients benefits from intervention with sustained MR ≤ II. Especially for elderly patients with reduced left ventricular function and relevant comorbidities, MitraClip™ therapy seems an adequate alternative to surgery. Assessment, treatment and postprocedural care of patients by an interdisciplinary team is of paramount importance for clinical success.

Key concepts: Functional mitral regurgitation, Medicine, Mitral regurgitation, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Percutaneous, Mitral valve, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment of functional mitral regurgitation – Intervention or surgery? — Research Paper | ScholarLens