1993PolityRequires access

Religious Liberty & Common Law: Free Exercise Exemptions & American Courts

James R. Stoner

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court, in recent Free Exercise and Establishment cases, seems to ground its decisions in the theory of political liberalism. This article, however, argues that the American tradition of religious liberty and its judicial protection must be understood not only in the context of liberalism but also in light of the common law heritage of American constitutionalism. The author concludes by examining an 1813 New York case in which free exercise of religion was vindicated on common law as well as constitutional grounds in a way that did not subordinate religious practice to liberal theory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The U.S. Supreme Court, in recent Free Exercise and Establishment cases, seems to ground its decisions in the theory of political liberalism. This article, however, argues that the American tradition of religious liberty and its judicial protection must be understood not only in the context of liberalism but also in light of the common law heritage of American constitutionalism. The author concludes by examining an 1813 New York case in which free exercise of religion was vindicated on common law as well as constitutional grounds in a way that did not subordinate religious practice to liberal theory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court, in recent Free Exercise and Establishment cases, seems to ground its decisions in the theory of political liberalism. This article, however, argues that the American tradition of religious liberty and its judicial protection must be understood not only in the context of liberalism but also in light of the common law heritage of American constitutionalism. The author concludes by examining an 1813 New York case in which free exercise of religion was vindicated on common law as well as constitutional grounds in a way that did not subordinate religious practice to liberal theory.

Key concepts: Free Exercise Clause, Law, Liberalism, Constitutionalism, Supreme court, Political science, Constitutional law, Constitutional theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Religious Liberty & Common Law: Free Exercise Exemptions & American Courts — Research Paper | ScholarLens