On the interdental cleaning
Noboru Yamamoto, Takeshi SUEDA, Shiro KINOSHITA
Abstract
Open-access reader
Noboru Yamamoto, Takeshi SUEDA, Shiro KINOSHITA
Abstract
Open-access reader
When gingival recession has been observed, it is diffecult to clean the approximate surfaces only using toothbrush. The purpose of this study is to observe which interdental cleaner is effective on the approximate surface. Three types of interdental cleaner have been studied. They were “Interdental brush (Denticator co.)”, “Rubber tip (Denticator co.)” and “Wooden stimulator (Navec International pty co.)”. Between the cleaning effect of interdental brush and that of rubber tip, significant difference (p<0.05) has been observed. Between the effect of interdental brush and that of wooden stimulator, there has not been difference statistically, but interdental brush has been seen more effective. Between the effect of wooden stimulator and that of rubber tip, significant difference has not been observed. It has been concluded that interdental brush will be effective for the interdental cleaning in the cases of gingival recession.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
When gingival recession has been observed, it is diffecult to clean the approximate surfaces only using toothbrush. The purpose of this study is to observe which interdental cleaner is effective on the approximate surface. Three types of interdental cleaner have been studied. They were “Interdental brush (Denticator co.)”, “Rubber tip (Denticator co.)” and “Wooden stimulator (Navec International pty co.)”. Between the cleaning effect of interdental brush and that of rubber tip, significant difference (p<0.05) has been observed. Between the effect of interdental brush and that of wooden stimulator, there has not been difference statistically, but interdental brush has been seen more effective. Between the effect of wooden stimulator and that of rubber tip, significant difference has not been observed. It has been concluded that interdental brush will be effective for the interdental cleaning in the cases of gingival recession.
Key concepts: Interdental consonant, Brush, Toothbrush, Significant difference, Dentistry, Natural rubber, Orthodontics, Medicine