1972日本歯周病学会会誌Open access

On the interdental cleaning

Noboru Yamamoto, Takeshi SUEDA, Shiro KINOSHITA

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

When gingival recession has been observed, it is diffecult to clean the approximate surfaces only using toothbrush. The purpose of this study is to observe which interdental cleaner is effective on the approximate surface. Three types of interdental cleaner have been studied. They were “Interdental brush (Denticator co.)”, “Rubber tip (Denticator co.)” and “Wooden stimulator (Navec International pty co.)”. Between the cleaning effect of interdental brush and that of rubber tip, significant difference (p<0.05) has been observed. Between the effect of interdental brush and that of wooden stimulator, there has not been difference statistically, but interdental brush has been seen more effective. Between the effect of wooden stimulator and that of rubber tip, significant difference has not been observed. It has been concluded that interdental brush will be effective for the interdental cleaning in the cases of gingival recession.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When gingival recession has been observed, it is diffecult to clean the approximate surfaces only using toothbrush. The purpose of this study is to observe which interdental cleaner is effective on the approximate surface. Three types of interdental cleaner have been studied. They were “Interdental brush (Denticator co.)”, “Rubber tip (Denticator co.)” and “Wooden stimulator (Navec International pty co.)”. Between the cleaning effect of interdental brush and that of rubber tip, significant difference (p<0.05) has been observed. Between the effect of interdental brush and that of wooden stimulator, there has not been difference statistically, but interdental brush has been seen more effective. Between the effect of wooden stimulator and that of rubber tip, significant difference has not been observed. It has been concluded that interdental brush will be effective for the interdental cleaning in the cases of gingival recession.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When gingival recession has been observed, it is diffecult to clean the approximate surfaces only using toothbrush. The purpose of this study is to observe which interdental cleaner is effective on the approximate surface. Three types of interdental cleaner have been studied. They were “Interdental brush (Denticator co.)”, “Rubber tip (Denticator co.)” and “Wooden stimulator (Navec International pty co.)”. Between the cleaning effect of interdental brush and that of rubber tip, significant difference (p<0.05) has been observed. Between the effect of interdental brush and that of wooden stimulator, there has not been difference statistically, but interdental brush has been seen more effective. Between the effect of wooden stimulator and that of rubber tip, significant difference has not been observed. It has been concluded that interdental brush will be effective for the interdental cleaning in the cases of gingival recession.

Key concepts: Interdental consonant, Brush, Toothbrush, Significant difference, Dentistry, Natural rubber, Orthodontics, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the interdental cleaning — Research Paper | ScholarLens