2016•Ekonomik YaklasimRequires access

Is there a Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Puzzle? New Evidence from a Nonlinear Asymmetric Panel Unit Root Test

Ayşegül Çorakcı

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This study re-examines the validity of the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis for 24 OECD countries. The econometric methodology implemented not only allows for asymmetric nonlinear mean reversion within a panel context, but also corrects for the cross-sectional dependence bias frequently encountered in panel data. This feature is important because a test that ignores the presence of asymmetry and cross-sectional dependence when they are in fact present in the data would lead to misleading results. We obtain relatively stronger evidence in favor of the PPP hypothesis when compared to the other alternative panel unit root tests. However, on the whole, this support is still weak even after allowing for asymmetric nonlinear mean reversion in the real exchange rate series. Therefore, to reconcile the data with the theory further methods should be developed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study re-examines the validity of the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis for 24 OECD countries. The econometric methodology implemented not only allows for asymmetric nonlinear mean reversion within a panel context, but also corrects for the cross-sectional dependence bias frequently encountered in panel data. This feature is important because a test that ignores the presence of asymmetry and cross-sectional dependence when they are in fact present in the data would lead to misleading results. We obtain relatively stronger evidence in favor of the PPP hypothesis when compared to the other alternative panel unit root tests. However, on the whole, this support is still weak even after allowing for asymmetric nonlinear mean reversion in the real exchange rate series. Therefore, to reconcile the data with the theory further methods should be developed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study re-examines the validity of the purchasing power parity (PPP) hypothesis for 24 OECD countries. The econometric methodology implemented not only allows for asymmetric nonlinear mean reversion within a panel context, but also corrects for the cross-sectional dependence bias frequently encountered in panel data. This feature is important because a test that ignores the presence of asymmetry and cross-sectional dependence when they are in fact present in the data would lead to misleading results. We obtain relatively stronger evidence in favor of the PPP hypothesis when compared to the other alternative panel unit root tests. However, on the whole, this support is still weak even after allowing for asymmetric nonlinear mean reversion in the real exchange rate series. Therefore, to reconcile the data with the theory further methods should be developed.

Key concepts: Purchasing power parity, Mean reversion, Unit root, Econometrics, Panel data, Economics, Relative purchasing power parity, Unit root test

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is there a Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Puzzle? New Evidence from a Nonlinear Asymmetric Panel Unit Root Test — Research Paper | ScholarLens