2012AQUA - Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and SocietyOpen access

Genotoxicity testing of samples generated during UV/H2O2 treatment of surface water for the production of drinking water using the Ames test in vitro and the Comet assay and the SCE test in vivo

E.J.M. Penders, Albertus Martijn, A. Spenkelink, G.M. Alink, Ivonne M.C.M. Rietjens, Wim Hoogenboezem

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

UV/H 2 O 2 treatment can be part of the process converting surface water to drinking water, but would pose a potential problem when resulting in genotoxicity.This study investigates the genotoxicity of samples collected from the water treatment plant Andijk, applying UV/H 2 O 2 treatment with an electrical energy dose of 0.54 kWh/m 3 and a H 2 O 2 dose of 6 mg/l.Genotoxicity was tested in vitro using the Ames and Comet assay.All samples showed negative results.Samples were also tested in in vivo genotoxicity tests in Eastern mudminnow fish (Umbra pygmaea) by a sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and a Comet assay.No significant increases in SCEs were observed, but gill cells isolated from fish exposed to water obtained immediately after UV/H 2 O 2 treatment and to Lake IJsselmeer water showed significantly increased DNA damage in the Comet assay.All other samples tested negative in this Comet assay.This indicates that DNA damaging compounds may result from the UV/H 2 O 2 treatment, but also that these can be efficiently eliminated upon granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment of the water.It is concluded that when combined with this subsequent GAC treatment, UV/H 2 O 2 treatment for the production of drinking water from surface water is not of concern with respect to genotoxicity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

UV/H 2 O 2 treatment can be part of the process converting surface water to drinking water, but would pose a potential problem when resulting in genotoxicity.This study investigates the genotoxicity of samples collected from the water treatment plant Andijk, applying UV/H 2 O 2 treatment with an electrical energy dose of 0.54 kWh/m 3 and a H 2 O 2 dose of 6 mg/l.Genotoxicity was tested in vitro using the Ames and Comet assay.All samples showed negative results.Samples were also tested in in vivo genotoxicity tests in Eastern mudminnow fish (Umbra pygmaea) by a sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and a Comet assay.No significant increases in SCEs were observed, but gill cells isolated from fish exposed to water obtained immediately after UV/H 2 O 2 treatment and to Lake IJsselmeer water showed significantly increased DNA damage in the Comet assay.All other samples tested negative in this Comet assay.This indicates that DNA damaging compounds may result from the UV/H 2 O 2 treatment, but also that these can be efficiently eliminated upon granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment of the water.It is concluded that when combined with this subsequent GAC treatment, UV/H 2 O 2 treatment for the production of drinking water from surface water is not of concern with respect to genotoxicity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

UV/H 2 O 2 treatment can be part of the process converting surface water to drinking water, but would pose a potential problem when resulting in genotoxicity.This study investigates the genotoxicity of samples collected from the water treatment plant Andijk, applying UV/H 2 O 2 treatment with an electrical energy dose of 0.54 kWh/m 3 and a H 2 O 2 dose of 6 mg/l.Genotoxicity was tested in vitro using the Ames and Comet assay.All samples showed negative results.Samples were also tested in in vivo genotoxicity tests in Eastern mudminnow fish (Umbra pygmaea) by a sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and a Comet assay.No significant increases in SCEs were observed, but gill cells isolated from fish exposed to water obtained immediately after UV/H 2 O 2 treatment and to Lake IJsselmeer water showed significantly increased DNA damage in the Comet assay.All other samples tested negative in this Comet assay.This indicates that DNA damaging compounds may result from the UV/H 2 O 2 treatment, but also that these can be efficiently eliminated upon granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment of the water.It is concluded that when combined with this subsequent GAC treatment, UV/H 2 O 2 treatment for the production of drinking water from surface water is not of concern with respect to genotoxicity.

Key concepts: Genotoxicity, Comet assay, Ames test, Sister chromatid exchange, Environmental chemistry, Chemistry, DNA damage, Surface water

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Genotoxicity testing of samples generated during UV/H2O2 treatment of surface water for the production of drinking water using the Ames test in vitro and the Comet assay and the SCE test in vivo — Research Paper | ScholarLens