1998•Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical AssociationOpen access

Tick Infestation and Tick-borne Diseases Infection of Dogs in Okinawa Island

Hisashi INOKUMA, Shizuo Yamamoto, Norimi TANAHARA, Tsuyoshi KIYUNA, Shoshin Ohshiro

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks were detected from 58 (57.4%) and 2, respectively, of 101 dogs examined in Okinawa Island. Of 170 sera 25 (14.7%) and 3 were positive for antibodies to Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon canis, respectively, while 16 (9.4%) had antibody to Babesia gibsoni. On the smear samples of peripheral blood from 164 dogs, there were no infected cells with E. canis or H. canis, while 8 of 164 (4.9%) were shown to be infected with Babesia spp. Microfilarias were seen on the peripheral blood from 35 of 164 (21.3%) dogs, and all of them were morphologically identified as those of mosquito-borne Dirofilaria immitis but not of tick-borne Dipetalonema spp.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks were detected from 58 (57.4%) and 2, respectively, of 101 dogs examined in Okinawa Island. Of 170 sera 25 (14.7%) and 3 were positive for antibodies to Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon canis, respectively, while 16 (9.4%) had antibody to Babesia gibsoni. On the smear samples of peripheral blood from 164 dogs, there were no infected cells with E. canis or H. canis, while 8 of 164 (4.9%) were shown to be infected with Babesia spp. Microfilarias were seen on the peripheral blood from 35 of 164 (21.3%) dogs, and all of them were morphologically identified as those of mosquito-borne Dirofilaria immitis but not of tick-borne Dipetalonema spp.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rhipicephalus sanguineus and Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks were detected from 58 (57.4%) and 2, respectively, of 101 dogs examined in Okinawa Island. Of 170 sera 25 (14.7%) and 3 were positive for antibodies to Ehrlichia canis and Hepatozoon canis, respectively, while 16 (9.4%) had antibody to Babesia gibsoni. On the smear samples of peripheral blood from 164 dogs, there were no infected cells with E. canis or H. canis, while 8 of 164 (4.9%) were shown to be infected with Babesia spp. Microfilarias were seen on the peripheral blood from 35 of 164 (21.3%) dogs, and all of them were morphologically identified as those of mosquito-borne Dirofilaria immitis but not of tick-borne Dipetalonema spp.

Key concepts: Rhipicephalus sanguineus, Babesia canis, Dirofilaria immitis, Ehrlichia canis, Haemaphysalis longicornis, Canis, Tick infestation, Tick

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tick Infestation and Tick-borne Diseases Infection of Dogs in Okinawa Island — Research Paper | ScholarLens