2014Unpublished venueOpen access

The variable relationship between arm and hand use: A rationale for using finger magnetometry to complement wrist accelerometry when measuring daily use of the upper extremity

Justin B. Rowe, Nizan Friedman, Vicky T. C. Chan, Steven C. Cramer, Mark A. Bachman, David J. Reinkensmeyer

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

Wrist-worn accelerometers are becoming more prevalent as a means to assess use of the impaired upper extremity in daily life after stroke. However, wrist accelerometry does not measure joint movements of the hand, which are integral to functional use of the upper extremity. In this study, we used a custom-built, non-obtrusive device called the manumeter to measure both arm use (via wrist accelerometry) and hand use (via finger magnetometry) of a group of unimpaired subjects while they performed twelve motor tasks at three intensities. We also gave the devices to four stroke subjects and asked them to wear them for six hours a day for one month. From the in-lab testing we found that arm use was a strong predictor of hand use for individual tasks, but that the slope of the relationship varied by up to a factor of ~12 depending on the task being performed. Consistent with this, in the daily use data collected from stroke subjects we found a broad spread in the relationship between arm and hand use. These results suggest that analyzing the spread of the relationship between daily hand and arm use will give more insight into upper extremity recovery than wrist accelerometry or finger magnetometry alone, because the spread reflects the nature of the daily tasks performed as well as the amount of upper extremity use.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Wrist-worn accelerometers are becoming more prevalent as a means to assess use of the impaired upper extremity in daily life after stroke. However, wrist accelerometry does not measure joint movements of the hand, which are integral to functional use of the upper extremity. In this study, we used a custom-built, non-obtrusive device called the manumeter to measure both arm use (via wrist accelerometry) and hand use (via finger magnetometry) of a group of unimpaired subjects while they performed twelve motor tasks at three intensities. We also gave the devices to four stroke subjects and asked them to wear them for six hours a day for one month. From the in-lab testing we found that arm use was a strong predictor of hand use for individual tasks, but that the slope of the relationship varied by up to a factor of ~12 depending on the task being performed. Consistent with this, in the daily use data collected from stroke subjects we found a broad spread in the relationship between arm and hand use. These results suggest that analyzing the spread of the relationship between daily hand and arm use will give more insight into upper extremity recovery than wrist accelerometry or finger magnetometry alone, because the spread reflects the nature of the daily tasks performed as well as the amount of upper extremity use.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Wrist-worn accelerometers are becoming more prevalent as a means to assess use of the impaired upper extremity in daily life after stroke. However, wrist accelerometry does not measure joint movements of the hand, which are integral to functional use of the upper extremity. In this study, we used a custom-built, non-obtrusive device called the manumeter to measure both arm use (via wrist accelerometry) and hand use (via finger magnetometry) of a group of unimpaired subjects while they performed twelve motor tasks at three intensities. We also gave the devices to four stroke subjects and asked them to wear them for six hours a day for one month. From the in-lab testing we found that arm use was a strong predictor of hand use for individual tasks, but that the slope of the relationship varied by up to a factor of ~12 depending on the task being performed. Consistent with this, in the daily use data collected from stroke subjects we found a broad spread in the relationship between arm and hand use. These results suggest that analyzing the spread of the relationship between daily hand and arm use will give more insight into upper extremity recovery than wrist accelerometry or finger magnetometry alone, because the spread reflects the nature of the daily tasks performed as well as the amount of upper extremity use.

Key concepts: Wrist, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Accelerometer, Upper limb, Physical therapy, Medicine, Activities of daily living, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The variable relationship between arm and hand use: A rationale for using finger magnetometry to complement wrist accelerometry when measuring daily use of the upper extremity — Research Paper | ScholarLens