Stent migration after stent-in-stent technique using a biodegradable stent
Giuseppe Roberto, Annalisa de Leone, D. Tamayo, Giancarla Fiori, Davide Ravizza, Cristina Trovato, Stefania De Lisi, Cristiano Crosta
Abstract
Open-access reader
Giuseppe Roberto, Annalisa de Leone, D. Tamayo, Giancarla Fiori, Davide Ravizza, Cristina Trovato, Stefania De Lisi, Cristiano Crosta
Abstract
Open-access reader
Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) seem to be the optimal choice for benign esophageal disorders, especially those not associated with a stricture, such as anastomotic leaks, iatrogenic perforations, and fistulas. On the other hand stent embedding can be an important limitation of SEMS placement, because this precludes safe stent removal [1]. In fact, in the literature there are only a few case series reporting the stent-in-stent technique using SEMS to remove embedded stents (14 – 189 days from the placement of the first stent) [2] [3].
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) seem to be the optimal choice for benign esophageal disorders, especially those not associated with a stricture, such as anastomotic leaks, iatrogenic perforations, and fistulas. On the other hand stent embedding can be an important limitation of SEMS placement, because this precludes safe stent removal [1]. In fact, in the literature there are only a few case series reporting the stent-in-stent technique using SEMS to remove embedded stents (14 – 189 days from the placement of the first stent) [2] [3].
Key concepts: Stent, Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Anastomosis