2012EndoscopyOpen access

Stent migration after stent-in-stent technique using a biodegradable stent

Giuseppe Roberto, Annalisa de Leone, D. Tamayo, Giancarla Fiori, Davide Ravizza, Cristina Trovato, Stefania De Lisi, Cristiano Crosta

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) seem to be the optimal choice for benign esophageal disorders, especially those not associated with a stricture, such as anastomotic leaks, iatrogenic perforations, and fistulas. On the other hand stent embedding can be an important limitation of SEMS placement, because this precludes safe stent removal [1]. In fact, in the literature there are only a few case series reporting the stent-in-stent technique using SEMS to remove embedded stents (14 – 189 days from the placement of the first stent) [2] [3].

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) seem to be the optimal choice for benign esophageal disorders, especially those not associated with a stricture, such as anastomotic leaks, iatrogenic perforations, and fistulas. On the other hand stent embedding can be an important limitation of SEMS placement, because this precludes safe stent removal [1]. In fact, in the literature there are only a few case series reporting the stent-in-stent technique using SEMS to remove embedded stents (14 – 189 days from the placement of the first stent) [2] [3].

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) seem to be the optimal choice for benign esophageal disorders, especially those not associated with a stricture, such as anastomotic leaks, iatrogenic perforations, and fistulas. On the other hand stent embedding can be an important limitation of SEMS placement, because this precludes safe stent removal [1]. In fact, in the literature there are only a few case series reporting the stent-in-stent technique using SEMS to remove embedded stents (14 – 189 days from the placement of the first stent) [2] [3].

Key concepts: Stent, Medicine, Surgery, Radiology, Anastomosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Stent migration after stent-in-stent technique using a biodegradable stent — Research Paper | ScholarLens