2015Unpublished venueRequires access

From Microseismic to Induced Seismicity: Monitoring the Full Band of Reservoir Seismicity

K. Bosman, Mike Preiksaitis, Adam Baig, Ted Urbancic

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Summary Seismic monitoring is an important tool for evaluating hydraulic fracture treatments in many petroleum reservoirs. Microseismic data is used to determine the extent of fracturing due to treatment and evaluate how effectively the reservoir is stimulated. Induced seismicity monitoring has become important recently, as the occurrence of high magnitude (MW > 0) events in several locations has led to the introduction of government-mandated “traffic light” systems to mitigate the impact of induced seismicity on the general public. To better understand the reservoir conditions which lead to the generation of large events, these two different ways of measuring seismic activity can be combined, incorporating the highly accurate event location accuracy from downhole microseismic monitoring with accurate source characterization of high magnitude events from surface induced seismicity monitoring. Such a monitoring system allows the full range of seismicity related to hydraulic fracture treatments to be accurately characterized. Combining the recorded data is a technical challenge, but with attention to detail in applying relevant corrections it is possible to achieve a consistent dataset. Data from a large multi-well zipper frac employing the full-band monitoring configuration is discussed in detail to illustrate the benefits of an integrated processing workflow in terms of increased understanding of the fracture process and conditions which lead to high magnitude events.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Seismic monitoring is an important tool for evaluating hydraulic fracture treatments in many petroleum reservoirs. Microseismic data is used to determine the extent of fracturing due to treatment and evaluate how effectively the reservoir is stimulated. Induced seismicity monitoring has become important recently, as the occurrence of high magnitude (MW > 0) events in several locations has led to the introduction of government-mandated “traffic light” systems to mitigate the impact of induced seismicity on the general public. To better understand the reservoir conditions which lead to the generation of large events, these two different ways of measuring seismic activity can be combined, incorporating the highly accurate event location accuracy from downhole microseismic monitoring with accurate source characterization of high magnitude events from surface induced seismicity monitoring. Such a monitoring system allows the full range of seismicity related to hydraulic fracture treatments to be accurately characterized. Combining the recorded data is a technical challenge, but with attention to detail in applying relevant corrections it is possible to achieve a consistent dataset. Data from a large multi-well zipper frac employing the full-band monitoring configuration is discussed in detail to illustrate the benefits of an integrated processing workflow in terms of increased understanding of the fracture process and conditions which lead to high magnitude events.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Seismic monitoring is an important tool for evaluating hydraulic fracture treatments in many petroleum reservoirs. Microseismic data is used to determine the extent of fracturing due to treatment and evaluate how effectively the reservoir is stimulated. Induced seismicity monitoring has become important recently, as the occurrence of high magnitude (MW > 0) events in several locations has led to the introduction of government-mandated “traffic light” systems to mitigate the impact of induced seismicity on the general public. To better understand the reservoir conditions which lead to the generation of large events, these two different ways of measuring seismic activity can be combined, incorporating the highly accurate event location accuracy from downhole microseismic monitoring with accurate source characterization of high magnitude events from surface induced seismicity monitoring. Such a monitoring system allows the full range of seismicity related to hydraulic fracture treatments to be accurately characterized. Combining the recorded data is a technical challenge, but with attention to detail in applying relevant corrections it is possible to achieve a consistent dataset. Data from a large multi-well zipper frac employing the full-band monitoring configuration is discussed in detail to illustrate the benefits of an integrated processing workflow in terms of increased understanding of the fracture process and conditions which lead to high magnitude events.

Key concepts: Microseism, Induced seismicity, Seismology, Geology, Hydraulic fracturing, Magnitude (astronomy), Geotechnical engineering, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From Microseismic to Induced Seismicity: Monitoring the Full Band of Reservoir Seismicity — Research Paper | ScholarLens