2005Unpublished venueRequires access

The History of the Clean Water Act

Ken Kirk Dee

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

America's Clean Water Future ... The Need for a Federal Re-Commitment As a direct result of the Clean Water Act's Construction Grants Program, the United States now enjoys perhaps the most advanced system of regional or "area-wide" wastewater treatment entities in the world. Secondary treatment is now the norm and many treatment plants have progressed beyond secondary treatment to advanced treatment technologies. Waterways that once were declared dead have been revitalized. Simply stated, the Grants Program was the most successful environmental public works program in the nation's history. It is no wonder that those of us who experienced this period of history not only understand but believe in the great accomplishments that can be achieved through a strong federal-state-local partnership. At the same time, we are now concerned about yet another looming water quality crisis directly attributable to the weakening of this historic partnership before the job is complete. Despite the tremendous progress made during the years of the Grants Program (1973–1991), it is clear that we are again losing ground in the battle to protect water quality. We are still far from the "zero discharge" and swimmable/fishable goals of the CWA, with over 40% of the nation's waters remaining impaired. Furthermore, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Congressional Budget Office, and the Government Accountability Office all performed their own independent studies of the nation's water infrastructure funding needs. Their estimates show a startling consensus of an estimated gap of $350 billion to $600 billion dollars over the next 20 years to repair and replace aging pipes and treatment works. The presentation will explore how to overcome this funding gap, including the concepts of increased rates, asset management and dedicated federal funding via a trust fund. The presentation will also focus on what the future will look like absent a meaningful federal/state/local funding partnership.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

America's Clean Water Future ... The Need for a Federal Re-Commitment As a direct result of the Clean Water Act's Construction Grants Program, the United States now enjoys perhaps the most advanced system of regional or "area-wide" wastewater treatment entities in the world. Secondary treatment is now the norm and many treatment plants have progressed beyond secondary treatment to advanced treatment technologies. Waterways that once were declared dead have been revitalized. Simply stated, the Grants Program was the most successful environmental public works program in the nation's history. It is no wonder that those of us who experienced this period of history not only understand but believe in the great accomplishments that can be achieved through a strong federal-state-local partnership. At the same time, we are now concerned about yet another looming water quality crisis directly attributable to the weakening of this historic partnership before the job is complete. Despite the tremendous progress made during the years of the Grants Program (1973–1991), it is clear that we are again losing ground in the battle to protect water quality. We are still far from the "zero discharge" and swimmable/fishable goals of the CWA, with over 40% of the nation's waters remaining impaired. Furthermore, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Congressional Budget Office, and the Government Accountability Office all performed their own independent studies of the nation's water infrastructure funding needs. Their estimates show a startling consensus of an estimated gap of $350 billion to $600 billion dollars over the next 20 years to repair and replace aging pipes and treatment works. The presentation will explore how to overcome this funding gap, including the concepts of increased rates, asset management and dedicated federal funding via a trust fund. The presentation will also focus on what the future will look like absent a meaningful federal/state/local funding partnership.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

America's Clean Water Future ... The Need for a Federal Re-Commitment As a direct result of the Clean Water Act's Construction Grants Program, the United States now enjoys perhaps the most advanced system of regional or "area-wide" wastewater treatment entities in the world. Secondary treatment is now the norm and many treatment plants have progressed beyond secondary treatment to advanced treatment technologies. Waterways that once were declared dead have been revitalized. Simply stated, the Grants Program was the most successful environmental public works program in the nation's history. It is no wonder that those of us who experienced this period of history not only understand but believe in the great accomplishments that can be achieved through a strong federal-state-local partnership. At the same time, we are now concerned about yet another looming water quality crisis directly attributable to the weakening of this historic partnership before the job is complete. Despite the tremendous progress made during the years of the Grants Program (1973–1991), it is clear that we are again losing ground in the battle to protect water quality. We are still far from the "zero discharge" and swimmable/fishable goals of the CWA, with over 40% of the nation's waters remaining impaired. Furthermore, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Congressional Budget Office, and the Government Accountability Office all performed their own independent studies of the nation's water infrastructure funding needs. Their estimates show a startling consensus of an estimated gap of $350 billion to $600 billion dollars over the next 20 years to repair and replace aging pipes and treatment works. The presentation will explore how to overcome this funding gap, including the concepts of increased rates, asset management and dedicated federal funding via a trust fund. The presentation will also focus on what the future will look like absent a meaningful federal/state/local funding partnership.

Key concepts: Clean Water Act, General partnership, Battle, Public administration, Accountability, Government (linguistics), Agency (philosophy), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The History of the Clean Water Act — Research Paper | ScholarLens