Epilepsy Following Injury to the Head
I. H. Hazleton
Abstract
I. H. Hazleton
Abstract
In both these cases there was nothing to be seen subsequently, save the minutest pojnt where the needle penetrated.It was ascertained, later, that both had been pro- perly vaccinated, though the marks now pointed out are equivocal.These cases show, however, that subcutaneous re-vacci- nations may not be unlike many other re- vaccinations performed in the usual way, in general nugatory features and results ; and are recorded here chiefly to show this, and the comparative harmlessness of the subcutaneous operation.The last was not so clear previous to tho trial, and the re- sponsibility, in case of untoward event, had to be fully assumed at the outset.It is certain, however, that in the first case tho boy x had never been vaccinated previous to our experiment.To his case, therefore, no exceptions can be taken.These are the only instances whero sub- cutaneous vaccination has as yet been per- mitted ; but now that it has proved to be unattended by disagreeable results, the ex- periment can be repeated, without risk, by others who may incline to try it for addi- tional confirmation of the fact now esta- blished.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In both these cases there was nothing to be seen subsequently, save the minutest pojnt where the needle penetrated.It was ascertained, later, that both had been pro- perly vaccinated, though the marks now pointed out are equivocal.These cases show, however, that subcutaneous re-vacci- nations may not be unlike many other re- vaccinations performed in the usual way, in general nugatory features and results ; and are recorded here chiefly to show this, and the comparative harmlessness of the subcutaneous operation.The last was not so clear previous to tho trial, and the re- sponsibility, in case of untoward event, had to be fully assumed at the outset.It is certain, however, that in the first case tho boy x had never been vaccinated previous to our experiment.To his case, therefore, no exceptions can be taken.These are the only instances whero sub- cutaneous vaccination has as yet been per- mitted ; but now that it has proved to be unattended by disagreeable results, the ex- periment can be repeated, without risk, by others who may incline to try it for addi- tional confirmation of the fact now esta- blished.
Key concepts: Epilepsy, Head injury, Head (geology), Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Medicine, Surgery, Psychiatry, Biology