1965Journal of Economic EntomologyRequires access

Screening Alfalfas for Resistance to Some Common Insect Pests in Arizona1

M. W. Nielson, M. H. Schonhorst

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

From 1959 to 1961 at Mesa, Arizona, numerous alfalfas were assessed for their performance when exposed to populations of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), thrips (mainly Frankliniella spp.), leafhoppers (mainly Aceratagallia curvata Oman and Beamer), the three-cornered alfalfa hopper, Spissistilus festinus (Say), and lygus bugs (principally Lygus Hesperus Knight). Although none of the alfalfas showed strong indications of resistance to these insects, several apparently have sufficient resistance to serve as sources for selection. The most promising alfalfas for three-cornered alfalfa hopper resistance were Chilean 21–5, Kansas 67–1108, and Sirsa #9; for pea aphid resistance, Doehnefeldt, Du Puits, Socheville Brand, and North Carolina Synthetic G3; and for lygus bug resistance, Zia, Rhizoma, and Stoneville Polycross No. 1. Significant differences among alfalfas in leahopper or thrips populations were not obtained.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

From 1959 to 1961 at Mesa, Arizona, numerous alfalfas were assessed for their performance when exposed to populations of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), thrips (mainly Frankliniella spp.), leafhoppers (mainly Aceratagallia curvata Oman and Beamer), the three-cornered alfalfa hopper, Spissistilus festinus (Say), and lygus bugs (principally Lygus Hesperus Knight). Although none of the alfalfas showed strong indications of resistance to these insects, several apparently have sufficient resistance to serve as sources for selection. The most promising alfalfas for three-cornered alfalfa hopper resistance were Chilean 21–5, Kansas 67–1108, and Sirsa #9; for pea aphid resistance, Doehnefeldt, Du Puits, Socheville Brand, and North Carolina Synthetic G3; and for lygus bug resistance, Zia, Rhizoma, and Stoneville Polycross No. 1. Significant differences among alfalfas in leahopper or thrips populations were not obtained.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

From 1959 to 1961 at Mesa, Arizona, numerous alfalfas were assessed for their performance when exposed to populations of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), thrips (mainly Frankliniella spp.), leafhoppers (mainly Aceratagallia curvata Oman and Beamer), the three-cornered alfalfa hopper, Spissistilus festinus (Say), and lygus bugs (principally Lygus Hesperus Knight). Although none of the alfalfas showed strong indications of resistance to these insects, several apparently have sufficient resistance to serve as sources for selection. The most promising alfalfas for three-cornered alfalfa hopper resistance were Chilean 21–5, Kansas 67–1108, and Sirsa #9; for pea aphid resistance, Doehnefeldt, Du Puits, Socheville Brand, and North Carolina Synthetic G3; and for lygus bug resistance, Zia, Rhizoma, and Stoneville Polycross No. 1. Significant differences among alfalfas in leahopper or thrips populations were not obtained.

Key concepts: Biology, Insect, Insecticide resistance, Resistance (ecology), Pesticide resistance, Toxicology, Pesticide, Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Screening Alfalfas for Resistance to Some Common Insect Pests in Arizona1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens