1987American LiteratureRequires access

The Poetics of Joan Didion's Journalism

Mark Z. Muggli

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

H ISTORIANS, political scientists, sociologists, and communication theorists have written valuable general analyses of the print media, but close analysis of individual journalistic texts has been rare. Shelley Fisher Fishkin has effectively studied the relationship of the journalism and fiction of five earlier American writers; and the New Journalism of the I96os and 70s stimulated discussion of the lengthy factual works of writers like Norman Mailer, Tom Wolfe, and Truman Capote, precisely because the analysis useful for novels seemed appropriate to these writers' para-fictions.1 But even the books on Joan Didion, including the otherwise useful anthology edited by Ellen Friedman, continue to underrepresent Didion's journalism. Her journalism deserves more detailed study, not merely because it comes from one of our important novelists and essayists, but because-unlike most reporting-it continues to speak with such authority. Most recent discussion of literary journalism has focused on reporters' complex involvement in their own news stories; a related argument over objective presentation and subjective interpretation continues in the popular press. The speaker of Didion's journalism has therefore gained some attention. Her I goes beyond the intentionally neutral voice of the daily newsreporter-it is a created, shifting character who speaks memorably and who sometimes anatomizes her own responses. But the most distinctive feature of Didion's journalism is not her presentation of self but her presentation of objects and events. Didion's reviewers and readers have always been conscious

About this research paper

What this paper is about

H ISTORIANS, political scientists, sociologists, and communication theorists have written valuable general analyses of the print media, but close analysis of individual journalistic texts has been rare. Shelley Fisher Fishkin has effectively studied the relationship of the journalism and fiction of five earlier American writers; and the New Journalism of the I96os and 70s stimulated discussion of the lengthy factual works of writers like Norman Mailer, Tom Wolfe, and Truman Capote, precisely because the analysis useful for novels seemed appropriate to these writers' para-fictions.1 But even the books on Joan Didion, including the otherwise useful anthology edited by Ellen Friedman, continue to underrepresent Didion's journalism. Her journalism deserves more detailed study, not merely because it comes from one of our important novelists and essayists, but because-unlike most reporting-it continues to speak with such authority. Most recent discussion of literary journalism has focused on reporters' complex involvement in their own news stories; a related argument over objective presentation and subjective interpretation continues in the popular press. The speaker of Didion's journalism has therefore gained some attention. Her I goes beyond the intentionally neutral voice of the daily newsreporter-it is a created, shifting character who speaks memorably and who sometimes anatomizes her own responses. But the most distinctive feature of Didion's journalism is not her presentation of self but her presentation of objects and events. Didion's reviewers and readers have always been conscious

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

H ISTORIANS, political scientists, sociologists, and communication theorists have written valuable general analyses of the print media, but close analysis of individual journalistic texts has been rare. Shelley Fisher Fishkin has effectively studied the relationship of the journalism and fiction of five earlier American writers; and the New Journalism of the I96os and 70s stimulated discussion of the lengthy factual works of writers like Norman Mailer, Tom Wolfe, and Truman Capote, precisely because the analysis useful for novels seemed appropriate to these writers' para-fictions.1 But even the books on Joan Didion, including the otherwise useful anthology edited by Ellen Friedman, continue to underrepresent Didion's journalism. Her journalism deserves more detailed study, not merely because it comes from one of our important novelists and essayists, but because-unlike most reporting-it continues to speak with such authority. Most recent discussion of literary journalism has focused on reporters' complex involvement in their own news stories; a related argument over objective presentation and subjective interpretation continues in the popular press. The speaker of Didion's journalism has therefore gained some attention. Her I goes beyond the intentionally neutral voice of the daily newsreporter-it is a created, shifting character who speaks memorably and who sometimes anatomizes her own responses. But the most distinctive feature of Didion's journalism is not her presentation of self but her presentation of objects and events. Didion's reviewers and readers have always been conscious

Key concepts: Poetics, Journalism, Literature, Art, History, Philosophy, Media studies, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Poetics of Joan Didion's Journalism — Research Paper | ScholarLens