1994•Journal of Ambulatory Care ManagementRequires access

An approach for conducting epidemiological surveillance in industry

James J. Collins

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

There are three unresolved issues in epidemiological surveillance: 1) should surveillance be hypothesis generating, 2) how much effort should be put into the design and data collection of a surveillance project, and 3) can useful surveillance be done with questionable data? It is concluded that epidemiological surveillance should be approached as an epidemiology study that examines the potential association between specific exposure and disease. This would include 1) a feasibility study to determine if surveillance on a particular subject is possible, 2) a detailed protocol, and 3) plans for data reduction, interpretation of findings, and worker communication. Epidemiological surveillance must be well planned and resourced to be used as a screening mechanism for occupational illness or injury excess, monitoring the health of workers exposed to specific substances, or setting priorities for future special studies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

There are three unresolved issues in epidemiological surveillance: 1) should surveillance be hypothesis generating, 2) how much effort should be put into the design and data collection of a surveillance project, and 3) can useful surveillance be done with questionable data? It is concluded that epidemiological surveillance should be approached as an epidemiology study that examines the potential association between specific exposure and disease. This would include 1) a feasibility study to determine if surveillance on a particular subject is possible, 2) a detailed protocol, and 3) plans for data reduction, interpretation of findings, and worker communication. Epidemiological surveillance must be well planned and resourced to be used as a screening mechanism for occupational illness or injury excess, monitoring the health of workers exposed to specific substances, or setting priorities for future special studies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

There are three unresolved issues in epidemiological surveillance: 1) should surveillance be hypothesis generating, 2) how much effort should be put into the design and data collection of a surveillance project, and 3) can useful surveillance be done with questionable data? It is concluded that epidemiological surveillance should be approached as an epidemiology study that examines the potential association between specific exposure and disease. This would include 1) a feasibility study to determine if surveillance on a particular subject is possible, 2) a detailed protocol, and 3) plans for data reduction, interpretation of findings, and worker communication. Epidemiological surveillance must be well planned and resourced to be used as a screening mechanism for occupational illness or injury excess, monitoring the health of workers exposed to specific substances, or setting priorities for future special studies.

Key concepts: Epidemiology, Epidemiological surveillance, Health surveillance, Protocol (science), Medicine, Environmental health, Data collection, Medical emergency

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An approach for conducting epidemiological surveillance in industry — Research Paper | ScholarLens