2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Hybrid Axial and Cross-Flow Fan Propulsion for Transonic Blended Wing Body Aircraft

Joseph Kummer, Jimmie Allred, James L. Felder

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Ideally, standard fan/engine designs can directly be embedded within the airframe of a vehicle. Unfortunately, doing so causes both performance penalties and structural challenges due to boundary layer flow ingested into the propulsors. For the present design concept, a dual-propulsion axial fan (AF) and cross-flow fan (CFF) system is investigated. This system provides the excellent efficiency of the axial fan, but with the benefit of the cross-flow fan system providing boundary layer flow mitigation. The purpose of this research was to develop the necessary computational tools to analyze this configuration, and then to show that the combined propulsor solution has performance benefits over the single axial fan system. Using both 2D and 3D CFD simulations, axial fan compression efficiency improvements of up to 2.5% were shown when the CFF propulsor was included. Also, the CFD data showed significant changes in the flow field due to the inclusion (or exclusion) of the distributed propulsors, demonstrating that it is impossible to segregate the airframe force calculations from those for the individual fans, thus necessitating a coupled airframe and propulsion approach to the design of such a vehicle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ideally, standard fan/engine designs can directly be embedded within the airframe of a vehicle. Unfortunately, doing so causes both performance penalties and structural challenges due to boundary layer flow ingested into the propulsors. For the present design concept, a dual-propulsion axial fan (AF) and cross-flow fan (CFF) system is investigated. This system provides the excellent efficiency of the axial fan, but with the benefit of the cross-flow fan system providing boundary layer flow mitigation. The purpose of this research was to develop the necessary computational tools to analyze this configuration, and then to show that the combined propulsor solution has performance benefits over the single axial fan system. Using both 2D and 3D CFD simulations, axial fan compression efficiency improvements of up to 2.5% were shown when the CFF propulsor was included. Also, the CFD data showed significant changes in the flow field due to the inclusion (or exclusion) of the distributed propulsors, demonstrating that it is impossible to segregate the airframe force calculations from those for the individual fans, thus necessitating a coupled airframe and propulsion approach to the design of such a vehicle.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ideally, standard fan/engine designs can directly be embedded within the airframe of a vehicle. Unfortunately, doing so causes both performance penalties and structural challenges due to boundary layer flow ingested into the propulsors. For the present design concept, a dual-propulsion axial fan (AF) and cross-flow fan (CFF) system is investigated. This system provides the excellent efficiency of the axial fan, but with the benefit of the cross-flow fan system providing boundary layer flow mitigation. The purpose of this research was to develop the necessary computational tools to analyze this configuration, and then to show that the combined propulsor solution has performance benefits over the single axial fan system. Using both 2D and 3D CFD simulations, axial fan compression efficiency improvements of up to 2.5% were shown when the CFF propulsor was included. Also, the CFD data showed significant changes in the flow field due to the inclusion (or exclusion) of the distributed propulsors, demonstrating that it is impossible to segregate the airframe force calculations from those for the individual fans, thus necessitating a coupled airframe and propulsion approach to the design of such a vehicle.

Key concepts: Transonic, Wing, Aerospace engineering, Propulsion, Aeronautics, Aerodynamics, Marine engineering, Flow (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hybrid Axial and Cross-Flow Fan Propulsion for Transonic Blended Wing Body Aircraft — Research Paper | ScholarLens