1983Journal of Applied EcologyRequires access

Thermal Time, Chill Days and Prediction of Budburst in Picea sitchensis

M. G. R. Cannell, R. I. Smith

Open publisher page 569 citations

Abstract

where thermal time was day degrees > 5 IC accumulated from 1 February, and chill days were the number of days <5 C counted from 1 November, both based on mean daily air temperature ((max. + min.)/2). This model may be used to estimate the date of budburst on young P. sitchensis of most provenances growing in upland Britain. (3) The following features or assumptions of the model were examined with reference to the literature and/or by experimentation: the small effect of provenance; linearity in the relationship between bud growth rate and temperature; the large effect of chilling on thermal time to budhurst; the omission of daylength and soil temperature as variables; the choice of starting dates for effective chilling and thermal time; and the use of simple fixed base temperatures. (4) The model was applied to mean daily temperatures at Eskdalemuir for the period 1912-82. The predicted dates of budburst ranged from 23 April in 1961 to 30 May in 1923, with a mean date of 12 May.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

where thermal time was day degrees > 5 IC accumulated from 1 February, and chill days were the number of days <5 C counted from 1 November, both based on mean daily air temperature ((max. + min.)/2). This model may be used to estimate the date of budburst on young P. sitchensis of most provenances growing in upland Britain. (3) The following features or assumptions of the model were examined with reference to the literature and/or by experimentation: the small effect of provenance; linearity in the relationship between bud growth rate and temperature; the large effect of chilling on thermal time to budhurst; the omission of daylength and soil temperature as variables; the choice of starting dates for effective chilling and thermal time; and the use of simple fixed base temperatures. (4) The model was applied to mean daily temperatures at Eskdalemuir for the period 1912-82. The predicted dates of budburst ranged from 23 April in 1961 to 30 May in 1923, with a mean date of 12 May.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 569 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

where thermal time was day degrees > 5 IC accumulated from 1 February, and chill days were the number of days <5 C counted from 1 November, both based on mean daily air temperature ((max. + min.)/2). This model may be used to estimate the date of budburst on young P. sitchensis of most provenances growing in upland Britain. (3) The following features or assumptions of the model were examined with reference to the literature and/or by experimentation: the small effect of provenance; linearity in the relationship between bud growth rate and temperature; the large effect of chilling on thermal time to budhurst; the omission of daylength and soil temperature as variables; the choice of starting dates for effective chilling and thermal time; and the use of simple fixed base temperatures. (4) The model was applied to mean daily temperatures at Eskdalemuir for the period 1912-82. The predicted dates of budburst ranged from 23 April in 1961 to 30 May in 1923, with a mean date of 12 May.

Key concepts: Botany, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Thermal Time, Chill Days and Prediction of Budburst in Picea sitchensis — Research Paper | ScholarLens