2010Japanese Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial SurgeryOpen access

Diagnostic accuracy and histopathologic findings of PET for cervical lymph node metastasis

Tomo Yokoi, Atsushi Abe, Shigeto ISHIHARA, Yosiko ARIJI, Susumu MIZUNO, Kenichi Kurita

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

FDG-PET is a useful diagnostic technique in the head and neck region; however, little is known about threshold standardized uptake values (SUV) and there are no definite diagnostic criteria. The purpose of this study was to determine the appropriate threshold SUV by comparing FDG accumulation with MRI and histopathological findings and to establish diagnostic criteria for cervical lymph node metastasis. We evaluated the uptake and measured SUV values of 54 metastatic lymph nodes on FDG-PET images in 12 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Size and enhancement patterns were evaluated on MR imaging. We also assessed invasion of the resected lymph nodes. PET had a sensitivity of 72.2 %, a specificity of 98.6 % and an accuracy of 96.1 % at a threshold SUV of 2.5, based on the pathological diagnosis. For small nodes (< 10 mm), sensitivity was 57.6 %. Lymph nodes with FDG accumulation showed a wide range of histopathological invasion.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

FDG-PET is a useful diagnostic technique in the head and neck region; however, little is known about threshold standardized uptake values (SUV) and there are no definite diagnostic criteria. The purpose of this study was to determine the appropriate threshold SUV by comparing FDG accumulation with MRI and histopathological findings and to establish diagnostic criteria for cervical lymph node metastasis. We evaluated the uptake and measured SUV values of 54 metastatic lymph nodes on FDG-PET images in 12 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Size and enhancement patterns were evaluated on MR imaging. We also assessed invasion of the resected lymph nodes. PET had a sensitivity of 72.2 %, a specificity of 98.6 % and an accuracy of 96.1 % at a threshold SUV of 2.5, based on the pathological diagnosis. For small nodes (< 10 mm), sensitivity was 57.6 %. Lymph nodes with FDG accumulation showed a wide range of histopathological invasion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

FDG-PET is a useful diagnostic technique in the head and neck region; however, little is known about threshold standardized uptake values (SUV) and there are no definite diagnostic criteria. The purpose of this study was to determine the appropriate threshold SUV by comparing FDG accumulation with MRI and histopathological findings and to establish diagnostic criteria for cervical lymph node metastasis. We evaluated the uptake and measured SUV values of 54 metastatic lymph nodes on FDG-PET images in 12 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Size and enhancement patterns were evaluated on MR imaging. We also assessed invasion of the resected lymph nodes. PET had a sensitivity of 72.2 %, a specificity of 98.6 % and an accuracy of 96.1 % at a threshold SUV of 2.5, based on the pathological diagnosis. For small nodes (< 10 mm), sensitivity was 57.6 %. Lymph nodes with FDG accumulation showed a wide range of histopathological invasion.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cervical lymph nodes, Lymph, Lymph node, Radiology, Head and neck, Pathological, Lymph node metastasis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic accuracy and histopathologic findings of PET for cervical lymph node metastasis — Research Paper | ScholarLens