2011American MineralogistRequires access

Replacement of pyrrhotite by pyrite and marcasite under hydrothermal conditions up to 220 C: An experimental study of reaction textures and mechanisms

Gujie Qian, Fang Xia, Joël Brugger, William Skinner, J. Bei, Gang Chen, Allan Pring

Open publisher page 104 citations

Abstract

The transformation of pyrrhotite to Fe disulfide (pyrite and/or marcasite) under hydrothermal conditions was studied experimentally by probing the effects of temperature (up to 220 °C, vaporsaturated pressures), ΣS(-II) concentrations, pH, and availability of oxygen on reaction progress and on the resulting textures. The pyrrhotite to Fe disulfide reaction proceeded by a dissolution-reprecipitation mechanism under all conditions. Marcasite and pyrite formed under both oxic and anaerobic conditions, which is inconsistent with the traditionally assumed polysulfide route for FeS 2 formation (oxidants required for polysulfide formation). The nature of the products was controlled by the level of supersaturation of the solution with respect to Fe disulfide minerals. Marcasite formed preferentially at low pH or S(-II)-deficient solutions (saturation index << 1000), while pyrite was the main product at saturation indices >1000. Different textures were obtained for the replacement of pyrrhotite by either pyrite or marcasite. Pyrite formation proceeded by direct replacement of pyrrhotite and, simultaneously, by overgrowth from solution. The pyrite crystals were >10 μm in size and randomly oriented. In comparison, marcasite crystals were <1 μm in size, and no significant overgrowth was observed. At pH 21°C <3, the marcasite nanocrystals showed the well-known crystallographic relationship with pyrrhotite, but at pH 21°C 3.96, the marcasite crystallites were randomly oriented. These experimental results confirm that the preservation of the crystallographic orientation is not a distinguishing feature between dissolution-reprecipitation and solid-state reactions. The different textures among pyrite and marcasite reflect the dominance of crystal growth (pyrite) vs. nucleation (marcasite) as a precipitation mechanism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The transformation of pyrrhotite to Fe disulfide (pyrite and/or marcasite) under hydrothermal conditions was studied experimentally by probing the effects of temperature (up to 220 °C, vaporsaturated pressures), ΣS(-II) concentrations, pH, and availability of oxygen on reaction progress and on the resulting textures. The pyrrhotite to Fe disulfide reaction proceeded by a dissolution-reprecipitation mechanism under all conditions. Marcasite and pyrite formed under both oxic and anaerobic conditions, which is inconsistent with the traditionally assumed polysulfide route for FeS 2 formation (oxidants required for polysulfide formation). The nature of the products was controlled by the level of supersaturation of the solution with respect to Fe disulfide minerals. Marcasite formed preferentially at low pH or S(-II)-deficient solutions (saturation index << 1000), while pyrite was the main product at saturation indices >1000. Different textures were obtained for the replacement of pyrrhotite by either pyrite or marcasite. Pyrite formation proceeded by direct replacement of pyrrhotite and, simultaneously, by overgrowth from solution. The pyrite crystals were >10 μm in size and randomly oriented. In comparison, marcasite crystals were <1 μm in size, and no significant overgrowth was observed. At pH 21°C <3, the marcasite nanocrystals showed the well-known crystallographic relationship with pyrrhotite, but at pH 21°C 3.96, the marcasite crystallites were randomly oriented. These experimental results confirm that the preservation of the crystallographic orientation is not a distinguishing feature between dissolution-reprecipitation and solid-state reactions. The different textures among pyrite and marcasite reflect the dominance of crystal growth (pyrite) vs. nucleation (marcasite) as a precipitation mechanism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 104 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The transformation of pyrrhotite to Fe disulfide (pyrite and/or marcasite) under hydrothermal conditions was studied experimentally by probing the effects of temperature (up to 220 °C, vaporsaturated pressures), ΣS(-II) concentrations, pH, and availability of oxygen on reaction progress and on the resulting textures. The pyrrhotite to Fe disulfide reaction proceeded by a dissolution-reprecipitation mechanism under all conditions. Marcasite and pyrite formed under both oxic and anaerobic conditions, which is inconsistent with the traditionally assumed polysulfide route for FeS 2 formation (oxidants required for polysulfide formation). The nature of the products was controlled by the level of supersaturation of the solution with respect to Fe disulfide minerals. Marcasite formed preferentially at low pH or S(-II)-deficient solutions (saturation index << 1000), while pyrite was the main product at saturation indices >1000. Different textures were obtained for the replacement of pyrrhotite by either pyrite or marcasite. Pyrite formation proceeded by direct replacement of pyrrhotite and, simultaneously, by overgrowth from solution. The pyrite crystals were >10 μm in size and randomly oriented. In comparison, marcasite crystals were <1 μm in size, and no significant overgrowth was observed. At pH 21°C <3, the marcasite nanocrystals showed the well-known crystallographic relationship with pyrrhotite, but at pH 21°C 3.96, the marcasite crystallites were randomly oriented. These experimental results confirm that the preservation of the crystallographic orientation is not a distinguishing feature between dissolution-reprecipitation and solid-state reactions. The different textures among pyrite and marcasite reflect the dominance of crystal growth (pyrite) vs. nucleation (marcasite) as a precipitation mechanism.

Key concepts: Marcasite, Pyrrhotite, Pyrite, Hydrothermal circulation, Sulfur, Greigite, Geology, Mineralogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Replacement of pyrrhotite by pyrite and marcasite under hydrothermal conditions up to 220 C: An experimental study of reaction textures and mechanisms — Research Paper | ScholarLens