1982LeonardoRequires access

The Artistic and Aesthetic Status of Forgeries

Tomáš Kulka

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

In the philosophy of art the following question is posed: Can there be any aesthetic value difference between an original painting and a forgery if they cannot be told apart, and, if so, what does it consist in? The author critically examines three currently held views in response to this question, including those of Nelson Goodman. He then turns his attention to both the aesthetic value and the artistic art-historical value of a painting, both of which may differ markedly. He concludes that if one considers these two characteristics one has a significant basis for resolving the puzzles concerning the aesthetic status of fakes and forgeries.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the philosophy of art the following question is posed: Can there be any aesthetic value difference between an original painting and a forgery if they cannot be told apart, and, if so, what does it consist in? The author critically examines three currently held views in response to this question, including those of Nelson Goodman. He then turns his attention to both the aesthetic value and the artistic art-historical value of a painting, both of which may differ markedly. He concludes that if one considers these two characteristics one has a significant basis for resolving the puzzles concerning the aesthetic status of fakes and forgeries.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the philosophy of art the following question is posed: Can there be any aesthetic value difference between an original painting and a forgery if they cannot be told apart, and, if so, what does it consist in? The author critically examines three currently held views in response to this question, including those of Nelson Goodman. He then turns his attention to both the aesthetic value and the artistic art-historical value of a painting, both of which may differ markedly. He concludes that if one considers these two characteristics one has a significant basis for resolving the puzzles concerning the aesthetic status of fakes and forgeries.

Key concepts: Aesthetics, Art, Visual arts

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Artistic and Aesthetic Status of Forgeries — Research Paper | ScholarLens