The Artistic and Aesthetic Status of Forgeries
Tomáš Kulka
Abstract
Tomáš Kulka
Abstract
In the philosophy of art the following question is posed: Can there be any aesthetic value difference between an original painting and a forgery if they cannot be told apart, and, if so, what does it consist in? The author critically examines three currently held views in response to this question, including those of Nelson Goodman. He then turns his attention to both the aesthetic value and the artistic art-historical value of a painting, both of which may differ markedly. He concludes that if one considers these two characteristics one has a significant basis for resolving the puzzles concerning the aesthetic status of fakes and forgeries.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In the philosophy of art the following question is posed: Can there be any aesthetic value difference between an original painting and a forgery if they cannot be told apart, and, if so, what does it consist in? The author critically examines three currently held views in response to this question, including those of Nelson Goodman. He then turns his attention to both the aesthetic value and the artistic art-historical value of a painting, both of which may differ markedly. He concludes that if one considers these two characteristics one has a significant basis for resolving the puzzles concerning the aesthetic status of fakes and forgeries.
Key concepts: Aesthetics, Art, Visual arts