1991•PubMedRequires access

Effect of reference microphone location and loudspeaker azimuth on probe tube microphone measurements.

M A Ickes, D B Hawkins, William A. Cooper

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

The effects of loudspeaker azimuth and reference microphone location on probe tube microphone measures were assessed. The real ear unaided response (REUR), real ear aided response (REAR), and real ear insertion response (REIR) were obtained on a KEMAR. Aided measures were obtained with both a behind-the-ear and an in-the-ear hearing aid. All three measurements were affected by changes in the loudspeaker azimuth and reference microphone location. Responses obtained with a 90 degree loudspeaker azimuth or with the reference microphone located at-the-ear revealed greater disparity than those obtained under other conditions. Most of the differences occurred at frequencies above 2000 Hz, with measurements utilizing the behind-the-ear hearing aid showing greater dispersion. These results suggest that the location of the loudspeaker and the reference microphone are important variables when utilizing probe tube microphone measurements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effects of loudspeaker azimuth and reference microphone location on probe tube microphone measures were assessed. The real ear unaided response (REUR), real ear aided response (REAR), and real ear insertion response (REIR) were obtained on a KEMAR. Aided measures were obtained with both a behind-the-ear and an in-the-ear hearing aid. All three measurements were affected by changes in the loudspeaker azimuth and reference microphone location. Responses obtained with a 90 degree loudspeaker azimuth or with the reference microphone located at-the-ear revealed greater disparity than those obtained under other conditions. Most of the differences occurred at frequencies above 2000 Hz, with measurements utilizing the behind-the-ear hearing aid showing greater dispersion. These results suggest that the location of the loudspeaker and the reference microphone are important variables when utilizing probe tube microphone measurements.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effects of loudspeaker azimuth and reference microphone location on probe tube microphone measures were assessed. The real ear unaided response (REUR), real ear aided response (REAR), and real ear insertion response (REIR) were obtained on a KEMAR. Aided measures were obtained with both a behind-the-ear and an in-the-ear hearing aid. All three measurements were affected by changes in the loudspeaker azimuth and reference microphone location. Responses obtained with a 90 degree loudspeaker azimuth or with the reference microphone located at-the-ear revealed greater disparity than those obtained under other conditions. Most of the differences occurred at frequencies above 2000 Hz, with measurements utilizing the behind-the-ear hearing aid showing greater dispersion. These results suggest that the location of the loudspeaker and the reference microphone are important variables when utilizing probe tube microphone measurements.

Key concepts: Loudspeaker, Microphone, Azimuth, Acoustics, Hearing aid, Computer science, Physics, Optics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of reference microphone location and loudspeaker azimuth on probe tube microphone measurements. — Research Paper | ScholarLens