2011•Practica oto-rhino-laryngologica SupplOpen access

The Effectiveness of Auditory Steady-State Response in Diagnosing Nonorganic Hearing Loss

Tsukasa Ito, Tomoo Watanabe, Yasuhiro Abe, Toshinori Kubota, Hiroyuki Chiba, Masaru Aoyagi

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Of the 26 cases of nonorganic hearing loss studied over the last 5 years, 19 cases were women and 7 were men. 18 had bilateral hearing loss and 8 had unilateral, mostly pure tone audiometry showing moderate “horizontal type” hearing loss, together with 2 of low tone hearing loss and 1 of high tone hearing loss. When pure tone hearing level and speech recognition threshold (SRT) were compared, SRT was lower than pure tone hearing level in 56% of ears. In self-recording audiometry by Bekesy, 54% of ears showed Jerger type V, unique in nonorganic hearing loss but not specific. Thresholds of click-evoked ABR and pure tone hearing level deviated among those with horizontal hearing loss, but ABR was not useful in detecting nonorganic low tone hearing loss. In all types of hearing impairment, especially in low tone hearing loss, auditory steady-state response (ASSR), a frequency specific response, was more useful than ABR in diagnosing nonorganic hearing loss.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Of the 26 cases of nonorganic hearing loss studied over the last 5 years, 19 cases were women and 7 were men. 18 had bilateral hearing loss and 8 had unilateral, mostly pure tone audiometry showing moderate “horizontal type” hearing loss, together with 2 of low tone hearing loss and 1 of high tone hearing loss. When pure tone hearing level and speech recognition threshold (SRT) were compared, SRT was lower than pure tone hearing level in 56% of ears. In self-recording audiometry by Bekesy, 54% of ears showed Jerger type V, unique in nonorganic hearing loss but not specific. Thresholds of click-evoked ABR and pure tone hearing level deviated among those with horizontal hearing loss, but ABR was not useful in detecting nonorganic low tone hearing loss. In all types of hearing impairment, especially in low tone hearing loss, auditory steady-state response (ASSR), a frequency specific response, was more useful than ABR in diagnosing nonorganic hearing loss.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Of the 26 cases of nonorganic hearing loss studied over the last 5 years, 19 cases were women and 7 were men. 18 had bilateral hearing loss and 8 had unilateral, mostly pure tone audiometry showing moderate “horizontal type” hearing loss, together with 2 of low tone hearing loss and 1 of high tone hearing loss. When pure tone hearing level and speech recognition threshold (SRT) were compared, SRT was lower than pure tone hearing level in 56% of ears. In self-recording audiometry by Bekesy, 54% of ears showed Jerger type V, unique in nonorganic hearing loss but not specific. Thresholds of click-evoked ABR and pure tone hearing level deviated among those with horizontal hearing loss, but ABR was not useful in detecting nonorganic low tone hearing loss. In all types of hearing impairment, especially in low tone hearing loss, auditory steady-state response (ASSR), a frequency specific response, was more useful than ABR in diagnosing nonorganic hearing loss.

Key concepts: Audiology, Hearing loss, Pure tone audiometry, Audiometry, Tone (literature), Pure tone, Medicine, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effectiveness of Auditory Steady-State Response in Diagnosing Nonorganic Hearing Loss — Research Paper | ScholarLens