2001Royal Institute of Philosophy SupplementRequires access

Rationality and Higher-Order Intentionality

Alan Millar

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

According tothe rationality thesis, the possession of propositional attitudes is inextricably tied to rationality. How in this context should we conceive of rationality? In one sense, being rational is contrasted with being non-rational, as when human beings are described as rational animals. In another sense, being rational is contrasted with being irrational. I shall call rationality in this latter senseevaluative rationality. Whatever else it might involve, evaluative rationality surely has to do with satisfying requirements of rationality such as, presumably, the following: (1) That one avoid inconsistency in beliefs. (2) That one not adopt new beliefs unless what one knows entails or is evidence for the truth of those beliefs. (3) That one not have φing as a goal yet do nothing necessary for one to φ. (Means/end requirement.)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

According tothe rationality thesis, the possession of propositional attitudes is inextricably tied to rationality. How in this context should we conceive of rationality? In one sense, being rational is contrasted with being non-rational, as when human beings are described as rational animals. In another sense, being rational is contrasted with being irrational. I shall call rationality in this latter senseevaluative rationality. Whatever else it might involve, evaluative rationality surely has to do with satisfying requirements of rationality such as, presumably, the following: (1) That one avoid inconsistency in beliefs. (2) That one not adopt new beliefs unless what one knows entails or is evidence for the truth of those beliefs. (3) That one not have φing as a goal yet do nothing necessary for one to φ. (Means/end requirement.)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

According tothe rationality thesis, the possession of propositional attitudes is inextricably tied to rationality. How in this context should we conceive of rationality? In one sense, being rational is contrasted with being non-rational, as when human beings are described as rational animals. In another sense, being rational is contrasted with being irrational. I shall call rationality in this latter senseevaluative rationality. Whatever else it might involve, evaluative rationality surely has to do with satisfying requirements of rationality such as, presumably, the following: (1) That one avoid inconsistency in beliefs. (2) That one not adopt new beliefs unless what one knows entails or is evidence for the truth of those beliefs. (3) That one not have φing as a goal yet do nothing necessary for one to φ. (Means/end requirement.)

Key concepts: Rationality, Ecological rationality, Irrational number, Epistemology, Intentionality, Principle of rationality, Possession (linguistics), Great Rationality Debate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rationality and Higher-Order Intentionality — Research Paper | ScholarLens