2014Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental SciencesOpen access

COMPARISON OF STANDARD URINE ANALYSIS WITH URINE DIP STICK TO DETECT URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN CHILDREN

Pooja K Suresh, Antony Jenifer J, L. Umadevi, M Rathinasamy

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

AIM: To Provide a prospective comparison of the rapid screening tests abilities (Standard urinalysis, Urine dipstick test) to detect UTI in children with suspected UTI, admitted to a tertiary care hospital.MATERIALS & METHODS: All children ≤12 yrs. of age, admitted with suspected urinary tract infection were included in the study.It is a Prospective, comparative study with a sample size of 500 cases.RESULTS: The epidemiological indices -sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the rapid screening tests (The standard urine analysis, enhanced urine analysis, urine dipstick test) were calculated individually for bacteriuria, pyuria, both and compared with a positive urine culture as the validating standard.CONCLUSIONS: All the rapid screening tests had low sensitivity (<70%) with similar positive predictive values.So no rapid test can screen accurately for UTI in young children.Hence urine culture, the gold standard for diagnosis should be sent if UTI is suspected.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To Provide a prospective comparison of the rapid screening tests abilities (Standard urinalysis, Urine dipstick test) to detect UTI in children with suspected UTI, admitted to a tertiary care hospital.MATERIALS & METHODS: All children ≤12 yrs. of age, admitted with suspected urinary tract infection were included in the study.It is a Prospective, comparative study with a sample size of 500 cases.RESULTS: The epidemiological indices -sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the rapid screening tests (The standard urine analysis, enhanced urine analysis, urine dipstick test) were calculated individually for bacteriuria, pyuria, both and compared with a positive urine culture as the validating standard.CONCLUSIONS: All the rapid screening tests had low sensitivity (<70%) with similar positive predictive values.So no rapid test can screen accurately for UTI in young children.Hence urine culture, the gold standard for diagnosis should be sent if UTI is suspected.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To Provide a prospective comparison of the rapid screening tests abilities (Standard urinalysis, Urine dipstick test) to detect UTI in children with suspected UTI, admitted to a tertiary care hospital.MATERIALS & METHODS: All children ≤12 yrs. of age, admitted with suspected urinary tract infection were included in the study.It is a Prospective, comparative study with a sample size of 500 cases.RESULTS: The epidemiological indices -sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the rapid screening tests (The standard urine analysis, enhanced urine analysis, urine dipstick test) were calculated individually for bacteriuria, pyuria, both and compared with a positive urine culture as the validating standard.CONCLUSIONS: All the rapid screening tests had low sensitivity (<70%) with similar positive predictive values.So no rapid test can screen accurately for UTI in young children.Hence urine culture, the gold standard for diagnosis should be sent if UTI is suspected.

Key concepts: Medicine, Dipstick, Urine, Pyuria, Urinalysis, Gold standard (test), Urinary system, Bacteriuria

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF STANDARD URINE ANALYSIS WITH URINE DIP STICK TO DETECT URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN CHILDREN — Research Paper | ScholarLens