COMPARISON OF STANDARD URINE ANALYSIS WITH URINE DIP STICK TO DETECT URINARY TRACT INFECTION IN CHILDREN
Pooja K Suresh, Antony Jenifer J, L. Umadevi, M Rathinasamy
Abstract
Open-access reader
Pooja K Suresh, Antony Jenifer J, L. Umadevi, M Rathinasamy
Abstract
Open-access reader
AIM: To Provide a prospective comparison of the rapid screening tests abilities (Standard urinalysis, Urine dipstick test) to detect UTI in children with suspected UTI, admitted to a tertiary care hospital.MATERIALS & METHODS: All children ≤12 yrs. of age, admitted with suspected urinary tract infection were included in the study.It is a Prospective, comparative study with a sample size of 500 cases.RESULTS: The epidemiological indices -sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the rapid screening tests (The standard urine analysis, enhanced urine analysis, urine dipstick test) were calculated individually for bacteriuria, pyuria, both and compared with a positive urine culture as the validating standard.CONCLUSIONS: All the rapid screening tests had low sensitivity (<70%) with similar positive predictive values.So no rapid test can screen accurately for UTI in young children.Hence urine culture, the gold standard for diagnosis should be sent if UTI is suspected.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIM: To Provide a prospective comparison of the rapid screening tests abilities (Standard urinalysis, Urine dipstick test) to detect UTI in children with suspected UTI, admitted to a tertiary care hospital.MATERIALS & METHODS: All children ≤12 yrs. of age, admitted with suspected urinary tract infection were included in the study.It is a Prospective, comparative study with a sample size of 500 cases.RESULTS: The epidemiological indices -sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the rapid screening tests (The standard urine analysis, enhanced urine analysis, urine dipstick test) were calculated individually for bacteriuria, pyuria, both and compared with a positive urine culture as the validating standard.CONCLUSIONS: All the rapid screening tests had low sensitivity (<70%) with similar positive predictive values.So no rapid test can screen accurately for UTI in young children.Hence urine culture, the gold standard for diagnosis should be sent if UTI is suspected.
Key concepts: Medicine, Dipstick, Urine, Pyuria, Urinalysis, Gold standard (test), Urinary system, Bacteriuria