1982Bulletin of Concerned Asian ScholarsOpen access

From peasants to petty commodity production in Southeast Asia

Joel S. Kahn

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

This paper represents a preliminary attempt to deal with transformations of the peasant economy in specific regions of Southeast Asia. I shall argue that the change is not simply the result of the incorporation of peasants within a world economy, but one that considerably predates the modern period. Nor can the change be viewed as part of a transition to capitalist forms of production. On the contrary the forms of production which have emerged differ in significant ways from those that developed in the capitalist core as merchant capital and feudal landed property gave way to industrial capital and capitalist relations of production. Accordingly, it would be unwise to assume that the existing situation represents some step in a necessary transition which will mirror changes that took place in Britain in the 18th and 19th centuries. As a consequence there is a need for forms of economic and political analysis not easily derivable from Marxist theories of the capitalist mode of production, or from theories of the “articulation” of modes of production in which the modes subordinated to capital are deduced directly from the functional prerequisites of capitalism conceived as an abstract, global structure.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper represents a preliminary attempt to deal with transformations of the peasant economy in specific regions of Southeast Asia. I shall argue that the change is not simply the result of the incorporation of peasants within a world economy, but one that considerably predates the modern period. Nor can the change be viewed as part of a transition to capitalist forms of production. On the contrary the forms of production which have emerged differ in significant ways from those that developed in the capitalist core as merchant capital and feudal landed property gave way to industrial capital and capitalist relations of production. Accordingly, it would be unwise to assume that the existing situation represents some step in a necessary transition which will mirror changes that took place in Britain in the 18th and 19th centuries. As a consequence there is a need for forms of economic and political analysis not easily derivable from Marxist theories of the capitalist mode of production, or from theories of the “articulation” of modes of production in which the modes subordinated to capital are deduced directly from the functional prerequisites of capitalism conceived as an abstract, global structure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper represents a preliminary attempt to deal with transformations of the peasant economy in specific regions of Southeast Asia. I shall argue that the change is not simply the result of the incorporation of peasants within a world economy, but one that considerably predates the modern period. Nor can the change be viewed as part of a transition to capitalist forms of production. On the contrary the forms of production which have emerged differ in significant ways from those that developed in the capitalist core as merchant capital and feudal landed property gave way to industrial capital and capitalist relations of production. Accordingly, it would be unwise to assume that the existing situation represents some step in a necessary transition which will mirror changes that took place in Britain in the 18th and 19th centuries. As a consequence there is a need for forms of economic and political analysis not easily derivable from Marxist theories of the capitalist mode of production, or from theories of the “articulation” of modes of production in which the modes subordinated to capital are deduced directly from the functional prerequisites of capitalism conceived as an abstract, global structure.

Key concepts: Capitalist mode of production, Peasant, Capitalism, Marxist philosophy, Commodity, Mode of production, Relations of production, Capital (architecture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From peasants to petty commodity production in Southeast Asia — Research Paper | ScholarLens