1946Poultry ScienceOpen access

Response of Turkey Poults to Vitamin D from Different Sources

James McGinnis, Robert J. Evans

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

IT IS difficult to account for the discrepancies in the literature on the response of turkey poults to vitamin D from different sources. Jukes and Sanford (1939) found under their experimental conditions that turkey poults needed a smaller number of A.O.A.C. chick units of vitamin D from sardine oil fortified with fish liver oils than from the U.S.P. reference cod liver oil No. 1. Sanford and Jukes (1944) later confirmed and extended these findings to show that vitamin D from a fish oil blend or activated animal sterol was more effective than vitamin D from U.S.P. reference cod liver oil No. 2 in promoting calcification in turkey poults. Boucher (1944) and Bird (1944) reported that irradiated animal sterol and irradiated 7-dehydrocholesterol were approximately twice as effective for turkeys as the vitamin D in U.S.P. reference cod liver oil No. 2. They found that 200 A.O.A.C. chick units per 100 grams . . .

About this research paper

What this paper is about

IT IS difficult to account for the discrepancies in the literature on the response of turkey poults to vitamin D from different sources. Jukes and Sanford (1939) found under their experimental conditions that turkey poults needed a smaller number of A.O.A.C. chick units of vitamin D from sardine oil fortified with fish liver oils than from the U.S.P. reference cod liver oil No. 1. Sanford and Jukes (1944) later confirmed and extended these findings to show that vitamin D from a fish oil blend or activated animal sterol was more effective than vitamin D from U.S.P. reference cod liver oil No. 2 in promoting calcification in turkey poults. Boucher (1944) and Bird (1944) reported that irradiated animal sterol and irradiated 7-dehydrocholesterol were approximately twice as effective for turkeys as the vitamin D in U.S.P. reference cod liver oil No. 2. They found that 200 A.O.A.C. chick units per 100 grams . . .

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

IT IS difficult to account for the discrepancies in the literature on the response of turkey poults to vitamin D from different sources. Jukes and Sanford (1939) found under their experimental conditions that turkey poults needed a smaller number of A.O.A.C. chick units of vitamin D from sardine oil fortified with fish liver oils than from the U.S.P. reference cod liver oil No. 1. Sanford and Jukes (1944) later confirmed and extended these findings to show that vitamin D from a fish oil blend or activated animal sterol was more effective than vitamin D from U.S.P. reference cod liver oil No. 2 in promoting calcification in turkey poults. Boucher (1944) and Bird (1944) reported that irradiated animal sterol and irradiated 7-dehydrocholesterol were approximately twice as effective for turkeys as the vitamin D in U.S.P. reference cod liver oil No. 2. They found that 200 A.O.A.C. chick units per 100 grams . . .

Key concepts: Cod liver oil, Sardine, Fish oil, Vitamin, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Food science, Biology, Vitamin D and neurology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Response of Turkey Poults to Vitamin D from Different Sources — Research Paper | ScholarLens