1957Avian DiseasesRequires access

Studies on Erysipelas in Turkeys

Clyde I. Boyer, Jubilee Brown

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

RYSIPELAS was first reported in New York State turkeys in 1938 by Van Roekel.15 Since then numerous cases of erysipelas have been found in New York5'11 and the disease is now recognized as a considerable economic problem in adult turkey flocks. In experimental work on turkey erysipelas some workers have had difficulty in maintaining virulence of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae cultures and obtaining a consistent and high mortality in inoculated turkeys. Adler and Spencer', Dickinson et al.6, and Moynihan and Stovell10 reported that an irregular mortality resulted when susceptible turkeys were challenged by other than the intravenous route. Adler and Spencer' also mentioned that it was difficult to maintain virulence of E. rhusiopathiae cultures that were lyophilized. Peterson and Hymas12 reported good mortality when the intramuscular route was used in non-immune turkeys. The percutaneous (skin scarification) route as originally described by Fortner and Dinter7 was found to be the only way to reproduce erysipelas in swine consistently. Some work has been done on the efficacy of vaccines for protection of turkeys. Dickinson, et al.,6 reported a variable degree of protection to experimental challenge of vaccinated field flocks. Jerstad and Johns9 reported that vaccinated flocks

About this research paper

What this paper is about

RYSIPELAS was first reported in New York State turkeys in 1938 by Van Roekel.15 Since then numerous cases of erysipelas have been found in New York5'11 and the disease is now recognized as a considerable economic problem in adult turkey flocks. In experimental work on turkey erysipelas some workers have had difficulty in maintaining virulence of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae cultures and obtaining a consistent and high mortality in inoculated turkeys. Adler and Spencer', Dickinson et al.6, and Moynihan and Stovell10 reported that an irregular mortality resulted when susceptible turkeys were challenged by other than the intravenous route. Adler and Spencer' also mentioned that it was difficult to maintain virulence of E. rhusiopathiae cultures that were lyophilized. Peterson and Hymas12 reported good mortality when the intramuscular route was used in non-immune turkeys. The percutaneous (skin scarification) route as originally described by Fortner and Dinter7 was found to be the only way to reproduce erysipelas in swine consistently. Some work has been done on the efficacy of vaccines for protection of turkeys. Dickinson, et al.,6 reported a variable degree of protection to experimental challenge of vaccinated field flocks. Jerstad and Johns9 reported that vaccinated flocks

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

RYSIPELAS was first reported in New York State turkeys in 1938 by Van Roekel.15 Since then numerous cases of erysipelas have been found in New York5'11 and the disease is now recognized as a considerable economic problem in adult turkey flocks. In experimental work on turkey erysipelas some workers have had difficulty in maintaining virulence of Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae cultures and obtaining a consistent and high mortality in inoculated turkeys. Adler and Spencer', Dickinson et al.6, and Moynihan and Stovell10 reported that an irregular mortality resulted when susceptible turkeys were challenged by other than the intravenous route. Adler and Spencer' also mentioned that it was difficult to maintain virulence of E. rhusiopathiae cultures that were lyophilized. Peterson and Hymas12 reported good mortality when the intramuscular route was used in non-immune turkeys. The percutaneous (skin scarification) route as originally described by Fortner and Dinter7 was found to be the only way to reproduce erysipelas in swine consistently. Some work has been done on the efficacy of vaccines for protection of turkeys. Dickinson, et al.,6 reported a variable degree of protection to experimental challenge of vaccinated field flocks. Jerstad and Johns9 reported that vaccinated flocks

Key concepts: Erysipelas, Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae, Flock, Biology, Veterinary medicine, Virulence, Inoculation, Virology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Studies on Erysipelas in Turkeys — Research Paper | ScholarLens