2012Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryRequires access

Effect of Direct Electric Current on Parietal Bone Osteogenesis

Jalil Modarresi, Hossein Agha Aghili, Maryam Karandish, Behrouz Jalali, Shokouh Taghipour Zahir

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It has been shown that biphasic electric stimuli may be effective in stimulation of bone growth. This study aimed to evaluate the role of direct electric current on osteogenesis of the parietal bone in a canine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After surgical implantation of assembly involving 3 electrodes in the parietal bones in 5 adult male dogs, 20-MA direct electric current was applied. As a control group, a neutral assembly was implanted on the contralateral side of the calvaria.After 45 days of implantation, through a second surgical procedure, the bone samples were taken off the implantation sites and subjected to histologic evaluation. The data were analyzed with SPSS 16 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) using Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The bony tissues from all tissue sample sites were viable. Foreign body reaction that was documented by the presence of giant cells was observed in all samples. Histologic evaluation of samples revealed no statistically significant difference with respect to inflammatory reaction, bony trabecular thickness, bone arrangement, and maturation among the 3 electrode types (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Direct electric stimulation of the parietal bone in this canine model revealed no statistically significant difference with respect to inflammatory reaction, bony trabecular thickness, bone arrangement, and maturation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: It has been shown that biphasic electric stimuli may be effective in stimulation of bone growth. This study aimed to evaluate the role of direct electric current on osteogenesis of the parietal bone in a canine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After surgical implantation of assembly involving 3 electrodes in the parietal bones in 5 adult male dogs, 20-MA direct electric current was applied. As a control group, a neutral assembly was implanted on the contralateral side of the calvaria.After 45 days of implantation, through a second surgical procedure, the bone samples were taken off the implantation sites and subjected to histologic evaluation. The data were analyzed with SPSS 16 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) using Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The bony tissues from all tissue sample sites were viable. Foreign body reaction that was documented by the presence of giant cells was observed in all samples. Histologic evaluation of samples revealed no statistically significant difference with respect to inflammatory reaction, bony trabecular thickness, bone arrangement, and maturation among the 3 electrode types (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Direct electric stimulation of the parietal bone in this canine model revealed no statistically significant difference with respect to inflammatory reaction, bony trabecular thickness, bone arrangement, and maturation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: It has been shown that biphasic electric stimuli may be effective in stimulation of bone growth. This study aimed to evaluate the role of direct electric current on osteogenesis of the parietal bone in a canine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After surgical implantation of assembly involving 3 electrodes in the parietal bones in 5 adult male dogs, 20-MA direct electric current was applied. As a control group, a neutral assembly was implanted on the contralateral side of the calvaria.After 45 days of implantation, through a second surgical procedure, the bone samples were taken off the implantation sites and subjected to histologic evaluation. The data were analyzed with SPSS 16 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) using Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: The bony tissues from all tissue sample sites were viable. Foreign body reaction that was documented by the presence of giant cells was observed in all samples. Histologic evaluation of samples revealed no statistically significant difference with respect to inflammatory reaction, bony trabecular thickness, bone arrangement, and maturation among the 3 electrode types (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Direct electric stimulation of the parietal bone in this canine model revealed no statistically significant difference with respect to inflammatory reaction, bony trabecular thickness, bone arrangement, and maturation.

Key concepts: Calvaria, Parietal bone, Medicine, Foreign body, Anatomy, Stimulation, Biomedical engineering, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Direct Electric Current on Parietal Bone Osteogenesis — Research Paper | ScholarLens