1963Annals of MathematicsRequires access

Some Indecomposable Group Representations

Everett C. Dade

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

In [1], Heller and Reiner have shown that any p-group G has infinitely many inequivalent, indecomposable rational integral representations, unless G is cyclic of order p or p2. In the present paper, we shall derive these results from a more general structural theorem in ? 2 below. This theorem states that, if 0 is any order in any algebraic number field K such that the p-group G has at least four distinct K-irreducible representations, then the group ring O[G] has infinitely many inequivalent, indecomposable torsion-free modules. From the available evidence, it seems that the converse to this statement ought to hold, i.e., that if G has three or fewer distinct K-irreducible representations, then O[G] has only finitely many distinct indecomposable torsion-free modules. Warning. We remark here once for all that any ring in this paper comes provided with an identity; any module is a left module; and the ring identity acts as the identity transformation of the module.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In [1], Heller and Reiner have shown that any p-group G has infinitely many inequivalent, indecomposable rational integral representations, unless G is cyclic of order p or p2. In the present paper, we shall derive these results from a more general structural theorem in ? 2 below. This theorem states that, if 0 is any order in any algebraic number field K such that the p-group G has at least four distinct K-irreducible representations, then the group ring O[G] has infinitely many inequivalent, indecomposable torsion-free modules. From the available evidence, it seems that the converse to this statement ought to hold, i.e., that if G has three or fewer distinct K-irreducible representations, then O[G] has only finitely many distinct indecomposable torsion-free modules. Warning. We remark here once for all that any ring in this paper comes provided with an identity; any module is a left module; and the ring identity acts as the identity transformation of the module.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In [1], Heller and Reiner have shown that any p-group G has infinitely many inequivalent, indecomposable rational integral representations, unless G is cyclic of order p or p2. In the present paper, we shall derive these results from a more general structural theorem in ? 2 below. This theorem states that, if 0 is any order in any algebraic number field K such that the p-group G has at least four distinct K-irreducible representations, then the group ring O[G] has infinitely many inequivalent, indecomposable torsion-free modules. From the available evidence, it seems that the converse to this statement ought to hold, i.e., that if G has three or fewer distinct K-irreducible representations, then O[G] has only finitely many distinct indecomposable torsion-free modules. Warning. We remark here once for all that any ring in this paper comes provided with an identity; any module is a left module; and the ring identity acts as the identity transformation of the module.

Key concepts: Indecomposable module, Mathematics, Converse, Torsion (gastropod), Group ring, Pure mathematics, Algebraic number, Identity (music)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Some Indecomposable Group Representations — Research Paper | ScholarLens