Karl Popper and the Frankfurt School
Roberto D’Amico
Abstract
Roberto D’Amico
Abstract
Abstract The infamous “methodology dispute” in German sociology that occurred primarily between Popper and Adorno, with further details taken care of by such surrogates as Hans Albert and the young Habermas, is best described as a misfire. Popper admitted he did not know the work of the Frankfurt School at the time, and even claims he was unaware they were committed to Hegelian-Marxism until well after the debate or he would simply have repeated the arguments he made years earlier in The Poverty of Historicism. Popper considered Adorno a poor philosopher but an interesting cultural critic, and specifically a good music theorist (since that was one of Popper's life-long interests).
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The infamous “methodology dispute” in German sociology that occurred primarily between Popper and Adorno, with further details taken care of by such surrogates as Hans Albert and the young Habermas, is best described as a misfire. Popper admitted he did not know the work of the Frankfurt School at the time, and even claims he was unaware they were committed to Hegelian-Marxism until well after the debate or he would simply have repeated the arguments he made years earlier in The Poverty of Historicism. Popper considered Adorno a poor philosopher but an interesting cultural critic, and specifically a good music theorist (since that was one of Popper's life-long interests).
Key concepts: Karl popper, Historicism, Hegelianism, German, Epistemology, Philosophy, Critical rationalism, Sociology